23 May '07 22:06>
Game 3463652
It started out as a benoni and quickly spiralled out of controll, leaving an interesting position after move 23 with many imbalances, white had won the exchange, a rook for a bishop, but was bound to lose his knight. After move 28, I had R+B+N and 4 pawns vs 2R's and 5 pawns... even though none of my pawns were connected, it actually seemed to help as the pawn 'islands' served as great support for my B+N, while white blundered in the end, I still think I could have promoted my pawn before white could have promoted his, or else forced the exchange of one of my minor pieces for his rook. What do you think?
It started out as a benoni and quickly spiralled out of controll, leaving an interesting position after move 23 with many imbalances, white had won the exchange, a rook for a bishop, but was bound to lose his knight. After move 28, I had R+B+N and 4 pawns vs 2R's and 5 pawns... even though none of my pawns were connected, it actually seemed to help as the pawn 'islands' served as great support for my B+N, while white blundered in the end, I still think I could have promoted my pawn before white could have promoted his, or else forced the exchange of one of my minor pieces for his rook. What do you think?