interesting phenomena
17 Aug '09 12:42My record (including a few non rated etc) would be
Against those 200-300 rating points better 1L
100-200 better 3L
0-50 better 1 loss
50-100 worse 6W 3L 1D
100-200 9W 2L 3D
200-300 21W 0L 0D
300-400 14W 4L 2D
400+ Worse 10W 0L 1D
Current rating 1816 yet I have not beaten anyone over 1766 (although only 5 games). Rating therefore acheived through mainly beating up 200-300 below range. Is it accurate? Probably? I could test it more by playing more opponents of my level but cannot really be bothered.
Against those 200-300 rating points better 1L
100-200 better 3L
0-50 better 1 loss
50-100 worse 6W 3L 1D
100-200 9W 2L 3D
200-300 21W 0L 0D
300-400 14W 4L 2D
400+ Worse 10W 0L 1D
Current rating 1816 yet I have not beaten anyone over 1766 (although only 5 games). Rating therefore acheived through mainly beating up 200-300 below range. Is it accurate? Probably? I could test it more by playing more opponents of my level but cannot really be bothered.
Back to Top