1. warum?
    Joined
    17 Dec '06
    Moves
    6821
    24 Feb '07 17:591 edit


    Rybka evaluates this as almost even... I think I would prefer White myself. (This is NOT a game in progress!).

    White to move.

    Thoughts?
  2. 1. e4!!
    Joined
    23 Dec '06
    Moves
    20068
    24 Feb '07 18:11
    If material was even I'd say black was better. White just doesn't have any developed pieces.
  3. Joined
    11 Sep '06
    Moves
    17376
    24 Feb '07 19:261 edit
    Well, in terms of just material, it seems that having a piece and pawn for a rook is considered a deficit of less than a pawn. Then, when you factor in that white is behind in development, equal seems like a reasonable assessment.

    Edit: Can white even hold onto the extra pawn, or will e6 eventually fall to things like Qc8 and Nc7?
  4. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    24 Feb '07 20:131 edit
    where is the extra pawn (9 th) ?

    I think the e6-pawn will fall most likely, at the cost of a few tempi. Nevertheless, black has enough development advantage to compensate for the exchange vs. pawn material disadvantage.
  5. Joined
    11 Jun '06
    Moves
    3516
    24 Feb '07 20:411 edit
    at first glance c4 looks like white's best chance to me
    Edit: f3 looks ok too
  6. Standard memberKorch
    Chess Warrior
    Riga
    Joined
    05 Jan '05
    Moves
    24932
    24 Feb '07 20:50
    Originally posted by Crushing Day
    [fen]q4k1r/p3p1bp/n2pPnp1/1pp2p2/8/6P1/PPP1PP1P/RNBQ1RK1 w - - 5 12[/fen]

    Rybka evaluates this as almost even... I think I would prefer White myself. (This is NOT a game in progress!).

    White to move.

    Thoughts?
    How long time did Rybka analyse this position? Actualy in some positions Rybka is overating good piece play.
  7. Joined
    12 Nov '06
    Moves
    4541
    24 Feb '07 21:191 edit
    Black can win the e6 pawn if he likes, there are no open lines for the extra rook so actually right now the knight is better then the rook. Black also has better development.

    I'm playing a game in progress right now, where I lost the exchange early where I have rook for knight. I have survived now for quite a lot of moves and there where a lot more open files in that game to start with, so this should defenitly be possible to play for black I think.

    The game is soon finnished for me I think. I can post it here if someone would like to have a look at it.
  8. Joined
    25 Sep '04
    Moves
    1779
    24 Feb '07 23:09
    Not very scientific but I did a shootout using Rybka and Fruit: +2 -3 =1
  9. Standard memberDiet Coke
    Forum Vampire
    Sidmouth, Uk
    Joined
    13 Nov '06
    Moves
    45871
    24 Feb '07 23:161 edit
    Black is 1-0 up in my shootout.

    Stupid Fritz 9.

    Comet B50 is soooo slow.
  10. warum?
    Joined
    17 Dec '06
    Moves
    6821
    24 Feb '07 23:42
    Originally posted by Korch
    How long time did Rybka analyse this position? Actualy in some positions Rybka is overating good piece play.
    Good point, Korch.

    I went back and ran it for 30 minutes on Rybka and got the following evals:

    depth=20

    Nd2 -- .48

    f3 -- .52

    c3 -- .55

    Then, I ran it for 30 mins. on Gandalf 6; a different conclusion was reached:

    depth = 18

    a4 -- .92

    G6 also looked at e4 for a long time.
  11. Kalamazoo, MI
    Joined
    30 Dec '06
    Moves
    9215
    25 Feb '07 00:48
    Originally posted by Crushing Day
    [fen]q4k1r/p3p1bp/n2pPnp1/1pp2p2/8/6P1/PPP1PP1P/RNBQ1RK1 w - - 5 12[/fen]

    Rybka evaluates this as almost even... I think I would prefer White myself. (This is NOT a game in progress!).

    White to move.

    Thoughts?
    Blacks equality is temporary. The e6 pawn falls so in straight material math we are +1. Black has more space and development with no weaknesses. I think Rybka may be over evaluating White's light square weakness around the king. With no QB Black will have a hard time exploiting this.

    I say .2-.5. If black finds an effective plan (h4? kingside attack) then maybe equality. If black plays lamely and white opens a file or two on the queenside then the heavy pieces may make the difference.
  12. Joined
    11 Sep '06
    Moves
    17376
    25 Feb '07 02:16
    Opps - not sure how I gave black an extra pawn in that position. 🙂 So I guess it's better to say that black will have a pawn for the exchange, plus beter piece play, perhaps, which is probably how Rybka gets to equality.
  13. Joined
    12 Nov '06
    Moves
    4541
    25 Feb '07 13:35
    Ok heres a game with rook against knight that was a drawGame 3153362
  14. Kalamazoo, MI
    Joined
    30 Dec '06
    Moves
    9215
    25 Feb '07 21:14
    The problem with engine evaluations is that even though White may be .92 or 1.14 he still has to win the game. Against a bad player I would rather have the extra pawn than the rook.
  15. Joined
    09 Dec '06
    Moves
    1553
    25 Feb '07 22:03
    Originally posted by giantrobot
    The problem with engine evaluations is that even though White may be .92 or 1.14 he still has to win the game. Against a bad player I would rather have the extra pawn than the rook.
    It is misleading to let computers decide, they play very differently.

    Against a human, I would rather be black. I like knights and clear position objectives.

    Computers play a lot better against knights than humans, so I would expect more tactical opportunities.

    Rooks need open files and with all the pawns, black will need to try to deny these.

    White will have much more difficulty to deny black strong outposts on the kingside. The imminent death of his d pawn will mean outposts in the center may appear if he advances his c and e pawns.

    Having a full set of pawns against a black squared bishop means that it may be "biting granite" for much of the game.

    White is in danger of having serious white square weaknesses on the kingside.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree