I have to post this game. On the theme of crushing the french...
Why you should never play the French against a swashbuckler:
Game 514997
In St. Nick's defense, I just happen to have caught him in a subtle-ish trap (though I'm sure its known to, and refuted by, theory, neither of us are really french players) and he's dominating me in the other game we're playing at the moment. An english game.
Which, I guess, makes me a German. Beating the French and losing to the English :-)
(although I think I may have to concede my swashbuckler title, I just hung a bishop in a fairly basic king's gambit variation... for shame, for shame...)
Originally posted by OsseHaving met both Kasparov and Short. Nigel Short is one hell of a nice guy who beat me easily in a simul, i have met him a few times and had letters from him,he is a straight forward good guy and a world class player.
I recall an annotation to a Kasparov-Short game that started 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2, which Kasp annotated as "3.Nc3 is more accurate, but Nd2 is good enough for the win."
Of course it may have had as much to do with his opponent as the opening 😀
Kasparov i have met twice (never played) he is one of the alltime great players, but in my experience an arrogant bore full of his own self importance, even if we forget that he "cheated" against Judit Polgar, we can expect this sort of annotation from him, i would rather see his comments on his series of uncharacteristic weak moves when losing to Deep Blue. of course it set up the return match well and Kasparov wouldn't have lost on purpose for any price, would he?