Go back
Is the French opening any good?

Is the French opening any good?

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

I think this is what I will adopt when I am playing black.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Yeah, e6 is a decent response to just about any first move by white.
Does anyone know of a opening move by white that could NOT be met
with e6? (without getting into trouble early?)

Vote Up
Vote Down

The French Defense is fantastic! Really stops attacks and puts alot of
pressure on white early on! I have a horrid record against the French!
Many top players here play the French ( Zum, Paul, etc...)

Vote Up
Vote Down

And they find ways to beat my butt with it...although I am looking into
some new lines

Dave

Vote Up
Vote Down

I generally try to avoid it. Have lost many games - so now I can
expect a plethera of french defenses now. But one of my better
games - 103222 was frenchish.
1. e4 e6
2. Nf3 d5
3. exd exd
4. d4
And I got into a really interesting attack later on.
David

Vote Up
Vote Down

many top players playing french here have been beaten as well. sin.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Maybe this should be in the general forum, but...
Is there any way to search the games on RHP by openings? I don't
think there is, but wouldn't it be nice to be able to enter a series of
opening moves and be presented with a list of games in which those
moves were played?

Vote Up
Vote Down

I agree but the work-load is piling up on Chris and Russ i.e. new
colors, tourney options, etc. that we should wait a while to ask them!
Fantastic idea though! I second that!

Vote Up
Vote Down

I have seen this function at Chessworld. It was pretty cool

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by !~TONY~!
I agree but the work-load is piling up on Chris and Russ i.e. new
colors, tourney options, etc. that we should wait a while to ask them!
Fantastic idea though! I second that!
is this option possible on the site

cos it sounds real cool idea

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by villa68
is this option possible on the site

cos it sounds real cool idea
Nope.
It would indeed be a great feature to have.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I have to post this game. On the theme of crushing the french...

Why you should never play the French against a swashbuckler:

Game 514997

In St. Nick's defense, I just happen to have caught him in a subtle-ish trap (though I'm sure its known to, and refuted by, theory, neither of us are really french players) and he's dominating me in the other game we're playing at the moment. An english game.

Which, I guess, makes me a German. Beating the French and losing to the English :-)

(although I think I may have to concede my swashbuckler title, I just hung a bishop in a fairly basic king's gambit variation... for shame, for shame...)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Is the French Defense any good? World chess championship games are the strongest level of play. At this level Alekhine, Botvinnik, Petrosian, and Spassky have played the French Defense. At this level of play any opening that produces so a good opening.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I recall an annotation to a Kasparov-Short game that started 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2, which Kasp annotated as "3.Nc3 is more accurate, but Nd2 is good enough for the win."

Of course it may have had as much to do with his opponent as the opening 😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Osse
I recall an annotation to a Kasparov-Short game that started 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2, which Kasp annotated as "3.Nc3 is more accurate, but Nd2 is good enough for the win."

Of course it may have had as much to do with his opponent as the opening 😀
Having met both Kasparov and Short. Nigel Short is one hell of a nice guy who beat me easily in a simul, i have met him a few times and had letters from him,he is a straight forward good guy and a world class player.
Kasparov i have met twice (never played) he is one of the alltime great players, but in my experience an arrogant bore full of his own self importance, even if we forget that he "cheated" against Judit Polgar, we can expect this sort of annotation from him, i would rather see his comments on his series of uncharacteristic weak moves when losing to Deep Blue. of course it set up the return match well and Kasparov wouldn't have lost on purpose for any price, would he?