Originally posted by Pudgy NinjaThis is what I should have said.
I think that the whole premise of this question is flawed. Dividing up players into the categories of "positional" and "combinatorial/tactical" is a false dichotomy. So called positional players are still looking for tactical opportunities as they improve their positions and tactical players improve their positional to create tactical opportunities. T ...[text shortened]... shop in that spot, it kind of looks like I did because it's exactly where it needs to be.
Originally posted by RJHindsSometimes the joy is somewhat muted because the opponent realises the mess he is in and resigns so the tactical brilliancy is stillborn. OTB i'll take the tactical brilliance but in serious corrspondence play I'll take the win however it arrives.
I guess the joy only comes when one has positioned his/her pieces so that a tactical brilliancy can be delivered. 😏
Originally posted by Roper300Well, when the enemy king is checkmated I would think that is a positionally won game.
The opposite is also truth.There is great joy when a tactical brilliancy leads to a positionally won game.
I think the greatest joy for me comes when I outplay the opponent from an equal position and it builds into a won ending... Of course a tactical brilliance, like a queen sac, is better for sharing.