1. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    18 Feb '11 00:433 edits
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    [b] The Second Trap
    You started off well Robbie but here you strayed of course.

    Opening Traps are the cartoons of the Chess world.
    The pie in the face, the bucket of water over the head, the banana skin.

    You cannot show a trap and leave it with "...with a huge plus for white."

    Who wants to see a huge plus?
    I can see a huge plus when I lo xg7 12. Bh6+ Kg8 13. Rg6+ hxg6 {It does not matter how Black recaptures...} 14. Nf6[/pgn][/b]
    Unclear?, unclear?, my trusty feer! how could that be so! I consider ...h5 to be a
    desperado attempt to save the position! Saying that, I dont like the bad press that
    traps get, they are an excellent way to learn to play chess ( i am on a crusade to
    dispel the myth that Grandmasters play proper chess, they have held the chess
    world to ransom for too long! We play coffee house chess, what good is their reams of analysis to us?
    The sooner one realises this, the better) Anyhow, here is a line, that I consider a
    refutation of ...h5. Does this trap have a name? I have played it twice myself with
    success, and regardless of what 'deep and meaningful', stuff passes for 'proper
    chess', it brought me great joy!


  2. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    18 Feb '11 01:25
    ok, here is another one! GreenPawns favourite defence to 1.e4, the Caro Khan.

  3. Joined
    29 Aug '09
    Moves
    1574
    18 Feb '11 09:48
    This is the sneaky advanced version of the shilling trap.


  4. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    18 Feb '11 11:092 edits
    Hi Dale.

    That is a line from the Two Knights Defence.
    The Shilling is a true 'trap'. marked out by 3...Nd4
    You risk getting a bad position by going for a quick Knock Out.

    Hi Robbie

    Another busted trap. Trap 3

    That Caro Khan (Schuster v Carls. Bremen 1914) Here:



    White does not play play 10.c3 but 10.Qd2.



    It just like studying openings.
    Look at the move they suggest and give it a few tugs and tries to see if
    it stands your test. Don't blindly accept.

    Same with a trap. You have to test it, juggle with it. jump on it.

    Traps of the Chessboard by Znosko-Borosky is littered with bust traps
    that ZB failed to to correct or point out.
    Look at traps 5, 9 & 10 for those who have the book.

    Then you read in the intro it was a re-hash of PitFalls of the Chessboard
    so the errors have been copied.

  5. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    18 Feb '11 15:001 edit
    sigh GP, must I provide more busts to your busts! Between you and I, if the truth be
    known i have spent the better part of my adult life contemplating all types of busts! 😉


  6. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    18 Feb '11 15:24
    Ok, this is a beautiful trap. It seems to me that the more closely a trap/zap follows
    the main theoretical line, the more delicious it becomes!

  7. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12431
    18 Feb '11 15:50
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    Normally in chess literature we are 'warned ', against learning traps, better to begin
    at the endgame, it will yield the most benefit, as the game progresses, you will be
    heading towards your area of strength etc etc 'Dont play traps, traps are bad!' It
    struck me that nothing could be further from the truth, for a study of traps can yield
    much good and what is more, they are fun!
    Now, hold on, just hold on a minute, our dear Scottish friend - which do you want, mad, attacking opening traps, or the Colle? Back in 1925 you could have them both together, but not these days, me Caledonian matey. And certainly not on a correspondence site. Over the board doon't'pub, sure. But here, I rather think not. Time to make up your mind, methinks.

    Richard
  8. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    18 Feb '11 16:033 edits
    Originally posted by Shallow Blue
    Now, hold on, just hold on a minute, our dear Scottish friend - which do you want, mad, attacking opening traps, or the Colle? Back in 1925 you could have them both together, but not these days, me Caledonian matey. And certainly not on a correspondence site. Over the board doon't'pub, sure. But here, I rather think not. Time to make up your mind, methinks.

    Richard
    Great and illustrious Shallow Blue, perhaps you misunderstand my intent on posting opening traps? I am not actually advocating playing them (unless of course conditions are favourable), merely looking at them to ascertain what the conditions were that led to the successful execution of such. Its these tactical and positional elements, weak squares, weak pawns, colour complexes, development with initiative etc which I am interested in, the traps themselves are only a means to an end.

    Also it appears to me not to matter where these are played, whether in the pub or in front of the pc, its the elements themselves which are of interest 🙂
  9. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    18 Feb '11 22:16
    Hi Rob.

    Yup tried a trap on you (perhasp should not have added 'best?'😉 😉
    But you have to show these things.

    Still not too happy with the examples.
    A trap, the one you describe as being sneered at, should be an unsound move
    that if it fails puts the trapper in a bad way.

    In Trap 4 White is doing nothing wrong, just making good moves.
    It is Black who slips up. If Black does not take the Rook then White is OK.

    Next you will be saying 1.d4 d5 2.c4 is an opening trap if Black takes the pawn
    and tries to hang on to it.

    The Estrin Trap v The Dragon.
    Now there is a double-edged move. If Black spots it you have nothing.
    Though I have won and drawn when the guys never took the e-pawn.

    You have to deliberatly make a bad move setting trap and hope
    your opponent turns you bad move into a good move.
    It's gamble.

    Lost count of the Blitz games I've had with this very line
    and I have mated in 8 moves OTB in a serious game.
  10. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    19 Feb '11 22:13
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    Hi Rob.

    Yup tried a trap on you (perhasp should not have added 'best?'😉 😉
    But you have to show these things.

    Still not too happy with the examples.
    A trap, the one you describe as being sneered at, should be an unsound move
    that if it fails puts the trapper in a bad way.

    In Trap 4 White is doing nothing wrong, just making good moves.
    It is ...[text shortened]... 6 mate has been seen a few times.} 9. Nxb5 Qa5+ 10. b4 {1-0 or disconection at blitz.}[/pgn]
    Lol, trapping the trapper with these best? remarks, how delightfully cunning Mr
    Greenpawn! Got any more Sicilian beauties, i liked the last one 🙂
  11. Donationketchuplover
    Isolated Pawn
    Wisconsin USA
    Joined
    09 Dec '01
    Moves
    71169
    20 Feb '11 12:301 edit
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    Ok, this is a beautiful trap. It seems to me that the more closely a trap/zap follows
    the main theoretical line, the more delicious it becomes!

    [pgn][Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "?"] [Black "?"] [Result "*"] [PlyCount "25"] 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 {The beginning of the Winnawer i believe, black immediately ...[text shortened]... a1 {A fatal mistake.} 12. c3 Ne7 13. Nb3 {a beautifully conceived trap!} *[/pgn]
    What are the consequences to 13...Qxa1? tia (refers to post made at 10:24 on 2-18-11)
  12. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    20 Feb '11 16:28
    Originally posted by ketchuplover
    What are the consequences to 13...Qxa1? tia (refers to post made at 10:24 on 2-18-11)
    that Blacks queen is trapped?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree