Mate in 13!:

Mate in 13!:

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
20 Mar 17
4 edits



At move 10, his rook went to the worse square possible. Necessary was R-f2.

His 1300 to my 1700 would say I should win but not this fast!

H

Joined
04 Nov 08
Moves
20511
20 Mar 17

Greed left the mate in one though

Isolated Pawn

Wisconsin USA

Joined
09 Dec 01
Moves
71289
21 Mar 17

Originally posted by Habeascorp
Greed left the mate in one though
I don't see it 🙁

Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
21 Mar 17

"Mate in 13" usually means a forced mate in 13. 😕

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
42492
21 Mar 17
1 edit

"I don't see it."

I think he means if WHite had not played 13.fxe4 then
there is no mate in one.after 13,Kd2,

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
21 Mar 17

Originally posted by greenpawn34
"I don't see it."

I think he means if WHite had not played 13.fxe4 then
there is no mate in one.after 13,Kd2,
He would have still been screwed, I take pawn with bishop, attacking rook , he moves rook to attack my queen and after I move queen out of attack, he has the choice to not take, putting me a piece up or take bishop and I take back with knight forking king and queen. so it was a lost position regardless of what he does.

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
21 Mar 17

Originally posted by sonhouse
[pgn][Event "Challenge"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2017.03.18"]
[EndDate "2017.03.20"]
[Round "?"]
[White "masam"]
[Black "sonhouse"]
[WhiteRating "1326"]
[BlackRating "1733"]
[WhiteElo "1326"]
[BlackElo "1733"]
[Result "0-1"]
[GameId "12136120"]

1. d4 e5 2. e3 e4 3. f3 Ng8f6 4. Nb1c3 Bf8b4 5. Bf1c4 d5 6. Bc4b3 c6 7. Ng1e2 exf ...[text shortened]... e possible. Necessary was R-f2.

His 1300 to my 1700 would say I should win but not this fast!
Well, he mishandled the opening. In the space of a few moves he buried his light squared bishop, moved his knight that was defending f3 and castled into your attack. I think had you played 1. ... d5 or 1. ... Nf6 he'd have been on more familiar territory and not botched it, or at least not so quickly. Well played.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
21 Mar 17

He needs to take a look at the Egmund Gambit if he wants to play 1.d4. It can mess you up in a hurry if you are caught off guard.

I lost fast once, got mad, looked it up. Now no problem to get into a middle game in decent shape.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
21 Mar 17

white asking for it and got it.