Go back
my sicilian variation

my sicilian variation

Only Chess

m

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
4432
Clock
10 May 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I have a very poor opening knowledge, in fact, I dont even use database cause when I do so I reach positions I'm not familiar with but my oponent is (I guess). So I just try to play them on my own and I have naturally developed this variation that I am very satisfied with the results. I know it's no big deal and probably a weak strategy, but I would like to know what do you guys think of it (and if it already exists).

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4

The whole thing is I just try to block the c5 pawn, and I think all sicilian variations are based on capturing that pawn, blocking the c5 pawn I can have more activity for my bishops (usually my next move is d3) and black usually have one or both bishops blocked that take some time to activate.

Bedlam

Joined
21 Apr 06
Moves
4211
Clock
10 May 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by monteirof
I have a very poor opening knowledge, in fact, I dont even use database cause when I do so I reach positions I'm not familiar with but my oponent is (I guess). So I just try to play them on my own and I have naturally developed this variation that I am very satisfied with the results. I know it's no big deal and probably a weak strategy, but I would like t ...[text shortened]... ove is d3) and black usually have one or both bishops blocked that take some time to activate.
The idea of main line sicilians (with d4) is for white to get a good initiative going in the opening/middlegame. Black tends to get better end games.

I dont think you idea is bad but it will probably said that black can equalize without much trouble since you're not really putting them under much pressure with Bc4 and d3.

s

Joined
01 Aug 04
Moves
3215
Clock
11 May 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by monteirof
I have a very poor opening knowledge, in fact, I dont even use database cause when I do so I reach positions I'm not familiar with but my oponent is (I guess). So I just try to play them on my own and I have naturally developed this variation that I am very satisfied with the results. I know it's no big deal and probably a weak strategy, but I would like t ...[text shortened]... ove is d3) and black usually have one or both bishops blocked that take some time to activate.
I'm not sure why you are worried about blocking the c pawn on move three. It's not going anywhere. By placing your bishop on c4 so early, you are inviting Black to play e6 and d5, expanding with tempo. Bc4 is ok vs. d6 sicilians, but it's not particularly effective vs. Nc6 or e6 sicilians. You would be better off playing your bishop to b5 (the Rossolimo). If you check a database, you'll see the difference:

3.Bc4 (White wins 24%, Black wins 55%!)
3.Bb5 (White wins 40%, Black wins 26% )

Obviously, statistics don't mean everything, but the above numbers are pretty convincing.

Scott

n
The Ever Living

Third Earth

Joined
17 Feb 07
Moves
35053
Clock
11 May 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by smrex13
I'm not sure why you are worried about blocking the c pawn on move three. It's not going anywhere. By placing your bishop on c4 so early, you are inviting Black to play e6 and d5, expanding with tempo. Bc4 is ok vs. d6 sicilians, but it's not particularly effective vs. Nc6 or e6 sicilians. You would be better off playing your bishop to b5 (the Rossolimo) ...[text shortened]... ly, statistics don't mean everything, but the above numbers are pretty convincing.

Scott
I agree 3.Bc4 is okay against 2...d6 systems but hardly anything to worry about after 2...Nc6 (black can play ...d5 in one move).

Your strategy seems all wrong however.

Find a system against the Sicilian with some concrete plans then you are making your moves with an idea in mind.

If you want to aviod theory 2.Nf3 with 3.Bb5 is okay as is 2.c3. Both are satisfactory (Sorry I simply cannot bring myself to say they are good) moves with simple ideas behind them.

m

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
4432
Clock
11 May 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Ok thanks. I'm convinced Bc4 is not a good third move. But I guess sometimes, specially in correspondence chess, it's good to play moves out of opening book, if you're not familiar with most openings like me. Even so if it's a weak move, a not so strong player may not know how to punish it and you can force him to make decisions that he's not used to make. But a strong player will probably know how to take advantage of this weak move.

Bedlam

Joined
21 Apr 06
Moves
4211
Clock
11 May 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

To be honest id say if you wanted to improve try the main line moves more than you try off beat ideas. For a long time I tried some dubious openings and although they served me well(ish) I did end up changing them all and then wishing id just gone with mainlines in the first place 🙂

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.