Go back
None attacked to All attacked

None attacked to All attacked

Only Chess

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
08 Jun 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

What is this site coming to when a guy can't even keep control of a hijacked thread. 😞

Anyway, this was buried in a thread about engine users.

Challenge: construct a legal position where A)White is attacking NONE of black's 16 pieces; but after he moves, he is B) attacking ALL of Black's 16 pieces.

"Attack" means "threaten to legally capture".

Good luck!

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
Clock
08 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
What is this site coming to when a guy can't even keep control of a hijacked thread. 😞

Anyway, this was buried in a thread about engine users.

Challenge: construct a legal position where [b]A)
White is attacking NONE of black's 16 pieces; but after he moves, he is B) attacking ALL of Black's 16 pieces.

"Attack" means "threaten to legally capture".

Good luck![/b]

After Kg1 or Ke1 every black piece is threatened. The position is legal if implausible.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
09 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DeepThought
[fen]3bQ3/4pppp/p1n2k1B/1p1r2N1/PNppP1n1/1PPq3b/r3BKPP/R2Q1R2 w KQkq - 0 1[/fen]
After Kg1 or Ke1 every black piece is threatened. The position is legal if implausible.
Ahh yes, I did leave this possibility open.

So I must add C) white is not in check.

DF

Joined
18 Feb 10
Moves
0
Clock
09 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

I can get as high as ten attack Black pieces after White's move. I'll be surprised if this can be improved upon.

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
Clock
09 Jun 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
Ahh yes, I did leave this possibility open.

So I must add [b]C)
white is not in check.[/b]

Rf1+ should do it then.

DF

Joined
18 Feb 10
Moves
0
Clock
09 Jun 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Unfortunately this doesn't quite comply with part A - "White is attacking NONE of black's 16 pieces". In fact 15 of Black's 16 pieces are under attack in the initial position!

DF

Joined
18 Feb 10
Moves
0
Clock
09 Jun 14
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

I thought of another solution over lunch.

If White is one of four people playing that well known chess variant, 3d exchange chess (aka 3d bughouse), with the agreed rule that pieces can be put on with check, then in the following position:

Top board:


Middle board:


Bottom board:


He can play his queen to e4 in the middle board, simultaneously attacking all 16 of Black's pieces.

DF

Joined
18 Feb 10
Moves
0
Clock
09 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Last attempt. None of Black's pieces at start, all of them attacked after White's second move.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
09 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

It can be done in orthodox chess in a single move.

Hint:

use pins

DF

Joined
18 Feb 10
Moves
0
Clock
09 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Thanks for the hint. I'm not happy with the white pawn on f6, but I can't get rid of it (stops white rook attacking f4):

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
09 Jun 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Data Fly
Thanks for the hint. I'm not happy with the white pawn on f6, but I can't get rid of it (stops white rook attacking f4):
[pgn][/pgn]
Almost! The only problem is Pf6 works a bit too well; bPf4 is still not attacked after 1.Nc6.

DF

Joined
18 Feb 10
Moves
0
Clock
09 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Let's go for Nd5 instead then.

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
Clock
09 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Data Fly
Unfortunately this doesn't quite comply with part A - "White is attacking NONE of black's 16 pieces". In fact 15 of Black's 16 pieces are under attack in the initial position!
Forgot about that, it was a fairly natural thing to wish to modify my original position rather than start from scratch. The problem is I'd have to.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
09 Jun 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Data Fly
Let's go for Nd5 instead then.
[pgn]
[FEN "5B2/1b2N1R1/1r1p1qP1/4p1p1/1r1p1p1p/2n1kN2/3p3p/4n1bK w - - 0 1"]
[SetUp "1"]
{
--------------
. k . q . B . .
r b . . N R . .
. . . p . P . .
n . . . p . p .
. r . p . p . p
. . . . . N . .
. . . p . . . p
. . . . n . b K
white to play
--------------
}
1. Nd5+
[/pgn]
Very good. That matrix is so good that I can get rid of two white units.

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
09 Jun 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
[b]Very good. That matrix is so good that I can get rid of two white units.
Unfortunately this doesn't quite comply with part A - "White is attacking NONE of black's 16 pieces".

However move Black's b7 bishop along to a7 and plonk a White rook onto h7 and you've got rid of the horrible pawn I had to add.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.