I go with Kamsky. He has more to prove than Topalov and it will probably be his last shot at the title. I just don't see him staying in the game if he loses, nor do I see him holding off Carlsen, who I think will soon be champion, but I could be wrong (i'm no chess expert). Plus Topalov has a lot of pressure on him to win in his home country, and he seems to be favored to win. He could crack under the extra pressure if Kamsky pulls some surprises. Kamsky came out of a long hiatus and played some darn good chess, I think he's got some good ideas and strong chess up his sleeve. We shall see!
Originally posted by angelo84It's explained (kind of) here: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3948
Why is it Kamsky and Topalov who only get to play for the chance to face Anand? Did they win some qualifying tournaments or their rating or what?
The short answer is that Topalov was assured a spot against the winner of the 2007 World Cup which Kamsky won.
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderSo these things are what used to be called interzonals?
It's explained (kind of) here: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3948
The short answer is that Topalov was assured a spot against the winner of the 2007 World Cup which Kamsky won.
Edit: read the thing properly now - I liked the mere rocket scientists bit at the end.