Originally posted by tvochess
But then, how often do you meet 1. f4 or 1... f5?
me dear tvochess, I meet 1.f5 all the time, my kids smartphone plays it a lot, also I
have met 1...f4 on not a few occasions, but this was not the point of my assertion,
that is, with what frequency i meet these openings, but that one can save a lot of
time and effort by playing similar systems. For example, I play the Colle as white,
problem solved, I need not learn French defence, Sicilians, Caro Khans, Ruy Lopez,
Petroffs, nada, I play the Colle, all I need to do is know when it works and when it
doesn't work depending on blacks set up. This leaves me with what to do as black.
Against 1.d4 I play the Colle with reversed colours, it is, after all, simply the Slav
with reversed colours anyway. I have halved my need to learn a system to play
against the queen pawn. If I meet 1.f4 i play what i would against the Dutch as
white, i have halved my need to learn to play a system as black. If I meet 1.e4, I
play the Sicilian, personal choice, yet if I meet the English as black, I simply play
the symmetrical English, essentially a Sicilian, I have halved my need to learn a
system against the English. That leaves 1.g4, which i dont think is very good for
white, i have a simple line which i posted and 1.b4 and 1.b3, which i also have
specific simple lines for so that i dont get wasted in the opening.
All in all, the point is, that i have a complete repertoire for black and white the basis
of which is to reduce opening theory as much as possible so that i can concentrate
on other more important things. Why? because i know what I like and what I feel
comfortable with. Ok my lines are not what Gm's play and they are not considered
the best, but i am neither a GM or a particularly good chess player, but I understand
them and they are easy to play which is the main thing.