Go back
Original pairing in tournaments

Original pairing in tournaments

Only Chess

Ravello
The Rude©

who knows?

Joined
30 Dec 03
Moves
176648
Clock
14 Jun 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

I just took a look at the Big timebank tournamentand the pairing is ''original'' instead of the usual random.
Can someone explain me how it works?thanks

L

Amsterdam

Joined
26 Jan 03
Moves
27540
Clock
14 Jun 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Original is highest against lowest, to prevent higher rated players from meeting in the first rounds and random is just random.

O.

Ravello
The Rude©

who knows?

Joined
30 Dec 03
Moves
176648
Clock
14 Jun 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Thanks a lot.
So Mephisto is going to play against a 1000 player in the first round...........................😕

s
515 + 30 days

Syver Yurt TC

Joined
08 Mar 03
Moves
38202
Clock
14 Jun 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LivingLegend
Original is highest against lowest, to prevent higher rated players from meeting in the first rounds and random is just random.

O.
Incorrect. The players are put in descending order by rank and then split into two equally numbered groups.
The top player in group one plays the top of group two, the second in group one plays the second in group two etc etc. It is a form of first level seeding.

skeeter

L

Amsterdam

Joined
26 Jan 03
Moves
27540
Clock
14 Jun 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by skeeter
Incorrect. The players are put in descending order by rank and then split into two equally numbered groups.
The top player in group one plays the top of group two, the second in group one plays the second in group two etc etc. It is a form of first level seeding.

skeeter
Hahaha, that is so not true, why would there be any fuzz about it if it was like this...

The big fuzz that started was because that with the original pairing system, the low rated players don't stand a chance of winning a tournament, with the random pairing system, they do. 🙂

Check out some of the first tournaments that were started if you don't believe me!

O.

s
515 + 30 days

Syver Yurt TC

Joined
08 Mar 03
Moves
38202
Clock
14 Jun 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LivingLegend
Hahaha, that is so not true, why would there be any fuzz about it if it was like this...

The big fuzz that started was because that with the original pairing system, the low rated players don't stand a chance of winning a tournament, with the random pairing system, they do. 🙂

Check out some of the first tournaments that were started if you don't believe me!

O.
I did, and that is how it was 'originally'done, and I don't.

skeeter

Ravello
The Rude©

who knows?

Joined
30 Dec 03
Moves
176648
Clock
14 Jun 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

So it's a pretty equal pairing........if it's true this is a good sistem for rating matching...............or not?

R

London

Joined
05 Mar 03
Moves
6047
Clock
19 Jun 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by skeeter
Incorrect. The players are put in descending order by rank and then split into two equally numbered groups.
The top player in group one plays the top of group two, the second in group one plays the second in group two etc etc. It is a form of first level seeding.

skeeter
Sorry, that's only half right. It is true that the players are put into descending order of rank and then split into as many groups as the group size calls for, so that each group contains a similar spread of rankings.

However, what happens next is that, within each group, all play all. This means that if there are N groups, it is very likely to be the N highest-ranked players that get though to the second round.

As Olav said, this form of seeding almost guarantees that low-ranked players get knocked out very quickly. They are admittedly guaranteed a few games against really good players, but it's not necessarily a fun experience.

In a random tournment, you have more chance of having some evenly-matched games. Weak players are unlikely to survive the second round, however as they are then likely meet the stongest of the strong.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.