18 Oct '08 09:39>
The post that was quoted here has been removedIt's not, but I'll bet $100 that PAWN RIOT is going to wipe us out now. If we want to have some better survival chances, a more sedate opening would be required IMO
Originally posted by schakuhrthere is no use crying over it now, the line has been drawn and the curse it has been cast, therefore if we are to face a dragon slayer in Yugoslavia, let us tread where other dragons have gone in the hope that we need not make the same mistakes as others and let us play with bravery, safe in valours arms.
It's not, but I'll bet $100 that PAWN RIOT is going to wipe us out now. If we want to have some better survival chances, a more sedate opening would be required IMO
Originally posted by najdorfslayerI don't understand the point of 18. h4 Rd6 19. Qe1. Black will respond with 19...Rb6 20. b3 a5 and have great counterplay. The point of 18. Qe1 is to stop a5 and make it hard for Black to unravel his queenside pieces effectively. 19. Qe1 doesn't really do anything. The best I could find here was again 21. Qe3, transposing back into the 18. Qe2 lines.
No I meant 18.h4! Rd6 19.Qe1
I know 18.Qe2 and 18.Qe1 (Adams-Ivanchuk) are both more popular.
However if White play 19.Qe2 it transposesto the same thing.
Originally posted by schakuhrWhat's this wimpy cr*p about "survival chances?" I say: Play to WIN no matter who your opponent is! It's more fun, and that's how you learn. At least that's my opinion. And as I like to say, everybody's entitled to my opinion!
It's not, but I'll bet $100 that PAWN RIOT is going to wipe us out now. If we want to have some better survival chances, a more sedate opening would be required IMO
Originally posted by gaychessplayer😕
What's this wimpy cr*p about "survival chances?" I say: Play to WIN no matter who your opponent is! It's more fun, and that's how you learn. At least that's my opinion. And as I like to say, everybody's entitled to my opinion!
Originally posted by schakuhrActually I remembered to take my meds. (I just love my Seroquel and Wellbutrin!)
😕
usually you are recommending playing systems like the colle and london. Have you forgotten to take your meds?
Originally posted by gaychessplayeri had a great time with the London, honestly it was excellent, it took equality to a new level for me, as for those who advocate that certain openings give white an advantage, yes, but it is usually minuscule and takes much better players than the average one to milk such a minuscule advantage to make it something more substantial, so gaychessplayer dude is correct, play with bravery, my goodness you are all honorary Scotsmen, the home of the last dragon in history, take heart and all will be well!
Actually I remembered to take my meds. (I just love my Seroquel and Wellbutrin!)
I recommend openings like the Colle and the London to players who have little time to study openings and/or have no burning ambition to try to achieve a significant opening advantage.
Assuming that one is trying to win as Black against a much stronger opponent, I b ...[text shortened]... but I'd rather go down swinging than doggedly trying to draw a boring Caro-Kann endgame.)
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou're Scottish and you misspelled Scotsmen?! 😲
i had a great time with the London, honestly it was excellent, it took equality to a new level for me, as for those who advocate that certain openings give white an advantage, yes, but it is usually minuscule and takes much better players than the average one to milk such a minuscule advantage to make it something more substantial, so gaychessplayer ...[text shortened]... all honorary Scotssmen, the home of the last dragon in history, take heart and all will be well!