Go back
PGN test

PGN test

Only Chess

1 edit

A little bird told me the PGN viewer got rewritten.

Let's try something then.



Edit: Woohoo, I put that in as 1.e4 d5 {CR} 2.d4 Nf6 and it took it.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Now, something straight from winboard, no editing:



Edit: Comments aren't showing up. Oh well - Rome wasn't built in one day.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Tried writing them in Danish?
....sorry... couldn't resist 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
A little bird told me the PGN viewer got rewritten.

Let's try something then.

[pgn]1.e4 d5
2.d4 Nf6[/pgn]

Edit: Woohoo, I put that in as 1.e4 d5 {CR} 2.d4 Nf6 and it took it.
Only on the beta. 🙂

The PGN parsing is the same as before too.

Vote Up
Vote Down

It still works using the old tried and trusted method.

Same game and the notes appear.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
...old tried and trusted method.
Who cares about that - I want the Way It Should Have Worked All Along.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Russ
Only on the beta. 🙂

The PGN parsing is the same as before too.
Hmm, but I didn't do that on the beta.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

It depends where the carriage return is. I always enter my games on this site in groups of five moves per line. If I split the move, for example by putting the CR after the move number, I get this:

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Data Fly
It depends where the carriage return is. I always enter my games on this site in groups of five moves per line. If I split the move, for example by putting the CR after the move number, I get this:

[pgn]1.e4 d5 2.
d4 Nf6[/pgn]
Oh, that's right. I am so used to working around that error that I had forgotten some of the particulars.


Here's a test from a ridiculous game I played in the last round of a tournament. Interestingly, it gives my comments, but leaves out the variations.

My OTB play is such that my team mates or club mates are always nervous, because I blunder and swindle with unsettling frequency and drama.



Beta version only!

This formatting is now legal for comments. See the 2nd post in the thread.


2. e4
{
hello!
}

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Russ
[b]Beta version only!

This formatting is now legal for comments. See the 2nd post in the thread.


2. e4
{
hello!
}
[/b]
Thanks, Russ! 🙂


Originally posted by Paul Leggett
Here's a test from a ridiculous game I played in the last round of a tournament. Interestingly, it gives my comments, but leaves out the variations.

My OTB play is such that my team mates or club mates are always nervous, because I blunder and swindle with unsettling frequency and drama.

[pgn][Event "Orlando Autumn Open"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2014 ...[text shortened]... ith errors. It is curious that most of the game occurred on the f-, g-, and h-files!} 1-0[/pgn]
Paul Leggett's game above with the variations turned into comments, so I can read them:

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DeepThought
Paul Leggett's game above with the variations turned into comments, so I can read them:
[pgn][Event "Orlando Autumn Open"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2014.10.12"]
[Round "5"]
[White "Paul Leggett"]
[Black "Bruce Kutikoff"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A07"]


1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 Nc6 3. Bg2 e5 4. d3 d5 {Komodo 8 already thinks black is on the better side of equal. ...[text shortened]... ith errors. It is curious that most of the game occurred on the f-, g-, and h-files!} 1-0[/pgn]
Thanks a bunch- I think I have to accept that I have limitations I may never overcome, and the pgn viewer seems to be one of them.