Go back
Queen sac before move 10!

Queen sac before move 10!

Only Chess

R

Joined
18 Sep 08
Moves
1480
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

This doesn't happen often.

Another trap in the nimzo:




Yes after that huge benoni thread, I'm still playing the nimzo. I haven't memorized all the lines of the benoni yet.

Additional thought: Deflection is a tactical motif that I've known about for a long time, but I feel I've only just started to use it within the last few months. I hope someone can learn from this pattern.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26754
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm not sure that counts as a Queen sac.

R

Joined
18 Sep 08
Moves
1480
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

It does. But to be technical I suppose I should call it a pseudo-sac as the material is regained plus a pawn.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Nice title to the thread (got my attention); but yes, that's not really a sac.

Nice trap though. 🙂

C
Strategos

Ancient Greece

Joined
12 Apr 09
Moves
2375
Clock
28 Apr 09
8 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ResigningSoon
This doesn't happen often.

Another trap in the nimzo:


[pgn]1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. f3 d5 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. Qd3 Ba5 7. e4 Nb4 8. Qd1 Qxd4 9. Qxd4 Nc2+ 10. Kf2 Nxd4 11. Be3 Nc2 0-1[/pgn]

Yes after that huge benoni thread, I'm still playing the nimzo. I haven't memorized all the lines of the benoni yet.

Additional thought: Deflectio started to use it within the last few months. I hope someone can learn from this pattern.
I don`t think that elementary combination can be considered as real sac. Look at this one:

[Event "Dyfed op"]
[Site "Fishguard"]
[Date "2003.02.??"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Williams,Arthur Howard"]
[Black "Cast,Jason"]
[Result "1/2"]
[Eco "E30"]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Bg5 c5 5.d5 Nxd5 6.Bxd8 Nxc3
7.Qb3 Ne4+ 8.Kd1 Nxf2+ 9.Kc2 Kxd8 10.Qg3 Nxh1 11.Qxg7 Re8
12.a3 Ba5 13.b4 Bc7 14.b5 f5 15.Qf6+ Re7 16.Nh3 d5 17.Qf8+ Re8 18.Qf6+ Re7 19.Qf8+ 1/2

14...f5? was not the best choice - after 14...d5! Black has serious advantage.

R

Joined
30 Mar 09
Moves
2000
Clock
28 Apr 09
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Cimon
I don`t think that elementary combination can be considered as real sac. Look at this one:

[Event "Dyfed op"]
[Site "Fishguard"]
[Date "2003.02.??"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Williams,Arthur Howard"]
[Black "Cast,Jason"]
[Result "1/2"]
[Eco "E30"]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Bg5 c5 5.d5 Nxd5 6.Bxd8 Nxc3
7.Qb3 Ne4+ 8.Kd1 Nxf2+ 9.Kc2 Kxd8 10.Qg3 Nxh1 11.Q ...[text shortened]...
14...f5? was not the best choice - after 14...d5! Black has serious advantage.
pgn thing not working.Why?

R

Joined
18 Sep 08
Moves
1480
Clock
28 Apr 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

C
Strategos

Ancient Greece

Joined
12 Apr 09
Moves
2375
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Another early sac:

http://www.danamackenzie.com/game1.htm

R

Joined
18 Sep 08
Moves
1480
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

And y'all can call this whatever y'all want. Under the wiki definition though this certainly counts as a sac.

C
Strategos

Ancient Greece

Joined
12 Apr 09
Moves
2375
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ResigningSoon
And y'all can call this whatever y'all want. Under the wiki definition though this certainly counts as a sac.
Referring to Wikipedia as serious source makes me smile 🙂

C
Strategos

Ancient Greece

Joined
12 Apr 09
Moves
2375
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

This one was after move 10, but I could not resist 🙂

R

Joined
18 Sep 08
Moves
1480
Clock
28 Apr 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Here's the above game:



I actually used to try and play this variation, but my opponents would always play 5...e6 leaving white with no advantage at all.

JoL
Curb Your Enthusiasm

London

Joined
04 Nov 07
Moves
4259
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Cimon
Referring to Wikipedia as serious source makes me smile 🙂
Indeed.

It seems that "winning a pawn" would be a more accurate description of the game in question.

R

Joined
30 Mar 09
Moves
2000
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ResigningSoon
[pgn][Event "Dyfed op"]
[Site "Fishguard"]
[Date "2003.02.??"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Williams,Arthur Howard"]
[Black "Cast,Jason"]
[Result "1/2"]
[Eco "E30"]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Bg5 c5 5.d5 Nxd5 6.Bxd8 Nxc3
7.Qb3 Ne4+ 8.Kd1 Nxf2+ 9.Kc2 Kxd8 10.Qg3 Nxh1 11.Qxg7 Re8
12.a3 Ba5 13.b4 Bc7 14.b5 f5 15.Qf6+ Re7 16.Nh3 d5 17.Qf8+ Re8 18.Qf6+ Re7 19.Qf8+ [/pgn]
What did you alter to make it work?

R

Joined
18 Sep 08
Moves
1480
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Cimon
Referring to Wikipedia as serious source makes me smile 🙂
I do, in fact, consider wiki a serious source. It is taken very seriously for the participants involved. It is peer-reviewed. And if a page doesn't contain accurate information, anyone can flag it as such.

So please, bring any inaccuracies in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrifice_(chess) to wiki's attention and make the world a better place.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.