Go back
Question on rules

Question on rules

Only Chess

P

Joined
06 Mar 05
Moves
0
Clock
06 Mar 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Please consider the following makeshift diagram:

http://phases-online.com/gallery/chess.jpg

We were debating whether or not the black king could take the knight that is below him. On the juan hand it would put him in check, but on the other the rook that would be checking the king, can't move - or the white king would be put in check.

Thanks in advance 🙂
-Phases

h

Joined
20 Dec 04
Moves
2615
Clock
06 Mar 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

No, it cannot. There are no circumstances under which king could put itself into check. (See it that way: black king would be "dead" before white king, so the game's over, no more moves for black Queen.)

T

Joined
07 Apr 03
Moves
130055
Clock
06 Mar 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phases
Please consider the following makeshift diagram:

http://phases-online.com/gallery/chess.jpg

We were debating whether or not the black king could take the knight that is below him. On the juan hand it would put him in check, but on the ...[text shortened]... white king would be put in check.

Thanks in advance 🙂
-Phases
The king can not take the knight even though the rook protecting the knight, can not move. Taking the knight would still put the king in check.

FIDE Rule 3.8a i. "The opponent's pieces are considered to attack a square, even if such pieces cannot themselves move."

-Tim

P.S. It doesn't matter anyway because there is also a Bishop protecting the knight

P

Joined
06 Mar 05
Moves
0
Clock
06 Mar 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Thanks for the quick replys guys! 🙂

The bishop protecting the knight wasn't in that spot in the real game... I went home and remade the part of the scenario that mattered and just kinda put all the other peices where ever.

But my question has been answered. Thanks much guys!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.