Only Chess
26 Sep 04
The matter is... the pawns are still in the second (or third) line, so the rook and the black king have the time to attack and capture them.
But with the pawns already in the fourth line (or such) the game is draw (the rook will have to sacrifice himself on the last pawn to avoid a white queen) and with the pawns on the fifth white wins. It's an old problem by Lucena, if I remember well, about XVI century...
Originally posted by lordsteIsn't there a rook on both sides in the Lucena position?
The matter is... the pawns are still in the second (or third) line, so the rook and the black king have the time to attack and capture them.
But with the pawns already in the fourth line (or such) the game is draw (the rook will have to sacrifice himself on the last pawn to avoid a white queen) and with the pawns on the fifth white wins. It's an old problem by Lucena, if I remember well, about XVI century...
Originally posted by Mephisto2Ah,relevant to this one,I don't know if he had any.Lordste thinks the given position,but with pawns on the fifth rank,was analysed by Lucena,but he's not 100% sure.And I have no idea
Then help me out. Could you (or anyone else) post one of these Lucena positions that is relevant to this endgame?
Originally posted by SirLoseALot[edit: I think I misread the thread]
Ah,relevant to this one,I don't know if he had any.Lordste thinks the given position,but with pawns on the fifth rank,was analysed by Lucena,but he's not 100% sure.And I have no idea
Two pawns on the sixth win against a Rook, assuming both Kings are out of the action. Three pawns on the 5th will win also. If they are on teh 4th rank I would think it is a loss, rather than a draw?
No idea who analysed these position first - I've only come across Lucena in conjunction with R+P v. R endgames.