Ranking Ratings

Ramned

The Rams

Only Chess

16 Jan 07 01:43

Ramned

The Rams

Joined: 04 Sep 06
Moves: 13491

16 Jan 07 01:43

What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc

~~Von Bardeleben~~

Joined: 15 Dec 06
Moves: 1588

16 Jan 07 01:50

1 edit

Originally posted by Ramned
What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc

lol

Diet Coke

Forum Vampire

Sidmouth, Uk

Joined: 13 Nov 06
Moves: 45871

16 Jan 07 01:51

1383 Spaz!

Ramned

The Rams

Joined: 04 Sep 06
Moves: 13491

16 Jan 07 01:54

Originally posted by Von Bardeleben
lol

😳

giantrobot

Kalamazoo, MI

Joined: 30 Dec 06
Moves: 9215

16 Jan 07 01:55

1200 new

Diet Coke

Forum Vampire

Sidmouth, Uk

Joined: 13 Nov 06
Moves: 45871

16 Jan 07 02:11

1500 Spazbait

Wulebgr

Angler

River City

Joined: 08 Dec 04
Moves: 16907

16 Jan 07 05:15

Originally posted by Ramned
What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc

below 2000: patzers
above 2000: cheaters

just kidding

The USCF has a system that makes sense. You could adopt it too.

2200+ master
2000-2199 expert
1800-1999 A class
1600-1799 B class
1400-1599 C class
1200-1399 D class
etc.

The Russians have a similar system: master, candidate master, etc.

Anthony Paton

Joined: 05 Oct 06
Moves: 2144

16 Jan 07 06:28

2500 Spaz-key?!

Diet Coke

Forum Vampire

Sidmouth, Uk

Joined: 13 Nov 06
Moves: 45871

16 Jan 07 10:26

Originally posted by Anthony Paton
2500 Spaz-key?!

😀🙄

gaychessplayer

Joined: 22 Aug 06
Moves: 359

22 Jan 07 23:32

2 edits

Originally posted by Ramned
What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc

Elite: 2500+
Accomplished: 2200-2499
Good: 1800-2199
Average: 1400-1799
Inexperienced: 1000-1399
Newbie ( I don't like calling people negative names like "bad" and "terrible"😉: under 1000

Just by opinion.

Very Rusty

RETIRED!

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Joined: 04 Oct 06
Moves: 825388

23 Jan 07 02:20

1 edit

Originally posted by gaychessplayer
Elite: 2500+
Accomplished: 2200-2499
Good: 1800-2199
Average: 1400-1799
Inexperienced: 1000-1399
Newbie ( I don't like calling people negative names like "bad" and "terrible"😉: under 1000

Just by opinion.

What would you call under 1000?

Newbie?......What about Novice?

AThousandYoung

Like a jungle

tinyurl.com/4emnyu9e

Joined: 23 Aug 04
Moves: 29250

23 Jan 07 09:46

1 edit

Originally posted by Very Rusty
What would you call under 1000?

Newbie?......What about Novice?

"tards"

Just kidding 🙂

Mephisto2

Joined: 12 Mar 03
Moves: 44411

23 Jan 07 09:51

Originally posted by Wulebgr
[b]

The USCF has a system that makes sense. You could adopt it too.

b]

This belongs in the paradox thread, no 😉

Korch

Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined: 05 Jan 05
Moves: 24932

23 Jan 07 10:34

Originally posted by Wulebgr
below 2000: patzers
above 2000: cheaters

just kidding

The USCF has a system that makes sense. You could adopt it too.

2200+ master
2000-2199 expert
1800-1999 A class
1600-1799 B class
1400-1599 C class
1200-1399 D class
etc.

The Russians have a similar system: master, candidate master, etc.

Not only russians, but all post-sovietic states.

Wulebgr

Angler

River City

Joined: 08 Dec 04
Moves: 16907

23 Jan 07 15:08

Originally posted by Mephisto2
This belongs in the paradox thread, no 😉

One almost thinks of satire when the USCF does something well, as if they do it to spite us.