What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.
Originally posted by Ramned What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.
Originally posted by Ramned What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.
Example 0-600 terrible etc
below 2000: patzers
above 2000: cheaters
just kidding
The USCF has a system that makes sense. You could adopt it too.
2200+ master
2000-2199 expert
1800-1999 A class
1600-1799 B class
1400-1599 C class
1200-1399 D class
etc.
The Russians have a similar system: master, candidate master, etc.
Originally posted by Ramned What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.
Example 0-600 terrible etc
Elite: 2500+
Accomplished: 2200-2499
Good: 1800-2199
Average: 1400-1799
Inexperienced: 1000-1399
Newbie ( I don't like calling people negative names like "bad" and "terrible"😉: under 1000
Originally posted by gaychessplayer Elite: 2500+
Accomplished: 2200-2499
Good: 1800-2199
Average: 1400-1799
Inexperienced: 1000-1399
Newbie ( I don't like calling people negative names like "bad" and "terrible"😉: under 1000
Ranking Ratings
16 Jan '07 01:43
Back to Top