Go back
Repeat moves

Repeat moves

Only Chess

Ian47

Chicago, IL.

Joined
09 Jan 16
Moves
85224
Clock
20 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just how many repeat moves have to be made before a called draw?

byedidia
Mister Why

San Carlos, CA

Joined
21 Feb 12
Moves
6039
Clock
21 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

You have to reach the same position with the same side to move three times.

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669775
Clock
21 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @ian47
Just how many repeat moves have to be made before a called draw?
And you have to Claim the drwa, no automatic drawing.

greenpawn34

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
43363
Clock
21 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

The moves do not have to be consecutive.

If this position was reach with White to play on move 40, 45 and 55.



White could, before making his 55th move, claim a draw stating the position
was about to be created for the 3rd time.

Officially there is no such thing as a perpetual check (though everyone uses the term)
A perpetual check will produce a three fold repetition of a position when a draw can be claimed.

A player may claim a draw if after 50 moves no pawn move or a capture has been
made during that time. What may not be too well known is if no capture or a pawn
move has been made after 75 moves An arbiter can stop the game and declare it drawn.

This is stop two happy chaps playing on and on and on with neither side
claiming a draw under the 50 move rule.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
21 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @byedidia
You have to reach the same position with the same side to move three times.
And with the same en passant rights [usually meaning there aren't any] and castling rights in all 3.

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
22 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @bigdoggproblem
And with the same en passant rights [usually meaning there aren't any]
Necessarily meaning there aren't any -- en passant rights are lost after the first move.

Also note that it doesn't have to be the same move which created that same position. In Greenpawn's example, it could've been reached by moving the rook twice, and the king the third time. Or the moves to reach that position could've been the rook all three times, but from three different directions. All valid: it's the three times repeated position which is important, not the moves.

mlb62

Joined
20 May 17
Moves
17517
Clock
22 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Arbiters can be wrong.. even with lack of sufficient material rules.!

ketchuplover
Isolated Pawn

Wisconsin USA

Joined
09 Dec 01
Moves
71666
Clock
22 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Is insufficient mating material an automatic draw?

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
22 Jul 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @ketchuplover
Is insufficient mating material an automatic draw?
If you can't mate at all, yes. If you can't force mate but can still help-mate, no.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.