It's the first time I faced f4 and I didn't know anything past e5. How would you handle this move?
I also don't have any chess engines to analyze with right now and they're not that great positionally anyway, so I'm wondering if someone could give me some suggestions. My main question is whether 11. ...gxf6 better than Bxf6? I played gxf6 because I didn't like the initiative he could get from Nd5. I also figured that castling kingisde would take my king too far from the center in an emerging endgame and that I may get a central majority with f5. Covering the g-file also seemed useful. On the other hand, it does mean doubled pawns. I''m really curious about the analysis here.
Also, was 15. O-O-O less accurate than Nxf3? I would appreciate any suggestions.
Originally posted by TheUltimateEmpire Blitz, makes you think very fast, which is good.
What does that have to do with anything? But yes, I do think it may help in spotting simple tactics. However, if you're not careful, it may make you think fast and make crappy moves. Thinking fast isn't always a virtue. It's thinking correctly that matters more.
Originally posted by TheUltimateEmpire Blitz, makes you think very fast, which is good.
Blitz tends to make me play terribly. I don't always choose the best move, I choose the move that stumps my opponent. When I do that on CC, my opponent just sits back and nulls it over a little bit and responds with a great move.
Originally posted by exigentsky What does that have to do with anything? But yes, I do think it may help in spotting simple tactics. However, if you're not careful, it may make you think fast and make crappy moves. Thinking fast isn't always a virtue. It's thinking correctly that matters more.
I mean fast, but good moves. Last year, I play very slow, but when someone wanted me play blitz with him, I refused because I was terrible, in fast games, but now, I can now play fast, but good games.