Originally posted by WulebgrAnalysis of its wins wouldn't suggest so. I'm not sure myself, but I think it has better knowledge in certain areas (e.g. evaluation of some endgames). It may also have a better search algorithm. I think the fact that the author is an IM has a significant affect on Rybka.
Perhaps it uses anti-computer strategies.
Originally posted by VarenkaWhich top level humans has it defeated?
Analysis of its wins wouldn't suggest so. I'm not sure myself, but I think it has better knowledge in certain areas (e.g. evaluation of some endgames). It may also have a better search algorithm. I think the fact that the author is an IM has a significant affect on Rybka.
Originally posted by Varenka> better knowledge in certain areas (e.g. evaluation of some endgames)
Analysis of its wins wouldn't suggest so. I'm not sure myself, but I think it has better knowledge in certain areas (e.g. evaluation of some endgames). It may also have a better search algorithm. I think the fact that the author is an IM has a significant affect on Rybka.
At least to my knowledge, endgames are the weakest part of Rybka or at least used to be. From what I've heard, Rybka uses it's pawns more efficiently than other engines and has better "understanding" of what's important in middle game.
Cheers'