It hapen that at the some day in two games i xon with a sacrifice fo a night at xb5! π΅ Game 2084836 and Game 2038448
Originally posted by Lydia Blondie1) after your 'sac' you got the material back within 3-4 moves, therefore it was a simple tactical device, so its not much of a "sacrifice" really is it?
It hapen that at the some day in two games i xon with a sacrifice fo a night at xb5! π΅ Game 2084836 and Game 2038448
2) 1400 -- 1700
if you were the 1400 I'd be impressed, but seeing as you were the big '700 picking of the small fry theses games don't seem too impressive...
Originally posted by Lydia BlondieI find hard to believe that you're a 1700 starting threads bragging about sacs which are not sacs and which can be easily refuted (see other thread)
It hapen that at the some day in two games i xon with a sacrifice fo a night at xb5! π΅ Game 2084836 and Game 2038448
Am I missing something?
Originally posted by z00tUs? Us? Where did this us come from? Not to mention that I am right. Those aren't sacs. 1700-1400 or not, those aren't sacs.
Are you insulting us? 1700 versus 1400 is not a contest. Find a game you have played against credible opposition. THis kind of a thing is a little annoying.
I hate you. You're wrong.
LOL, guys, what's wrhong with u? π I didn't say I am a genius. Yes, both combinations are simple, so what? I am not a GM, even not a master, and I think u r not too. However, it is a sacrifice, yes, I had material back in a few moves, so what? This is a point of a combination, in 3 moves or 13! Stay cool and not be jelous! π
Originally posted by Lydia Blondiethese rhp posters sound very hostile. so let me be the first to thank you for the games and the post.
LOL, guys, what's wrhong with u? π I didn't say I am a genius. Yes, both combinations are simple, so what? I am not a GM, even not a master, and I think u r not too. However, it is a sacrifice, yes, I had material back in a few moves, so what? This is a point of a combination, in 3 moves or 13! Stay cool and not be jelous! π