Originally posted by XanthosNZAgain, I have to comment. I should save this post to my computer, so that I can re-use it.
2. Na3 scores better than any other move in the Sicilian. That must be the best response.
Just because a move scores better doesn't make it better.
Particularly when we are talking about the 2nd move of the game.
1. g4 wins 62% of the time. 1. e4 wins 37.1% of the time. Does that mean that 1. g4 is a better move than 1. e4?
Originally posted by Red NightI'll give you a break because you're new here. I'm Xanthos and occasionally I am ever so slightly sarcastic.
Again, I have to comment. I should save this post to my computer, so that I can re-use it.
Just because a move scores better doesn't make it better.
Particularly when we are talking about the 2nd move of the game.
1. g4 wins 62% of the time. 1. e4 wins 37.1% of the time. Does that mean that 1. g4 is a better move than 1. e4?
Originally posted by XanthosNZSorry, Xanthos. I think I saw the sarcasm, but wasn't sure if everyone else did.
I'll give you a break because you're new here. I'm Xanthos and occasionally I am ever so slightly sarcastic.
This database winning percentage rating thing is endemic on the sight.
I keep hearing and seeing references to you.
I hope to get to play you at some point.
Originally posted by Red NightProve to me 1. g4 isn't as good. Just curious; just because it is not played often why does that immediatly make it a bad move?
Again, I have to comment. I should save this post to my computer, so that I can re-use it.
Just because a move scores better doesn't make it better.
Particularly when we are talking about the 2nd move of the game.
1. g4 wins 62% of the time. 1. e4 wins 37.1% of the time. Does that mean that 1. g4 is a better move than 1. e4?