White to move.
this is an adapted position taken from Tal v Smyslov 1959, the only difference between the position in the game (after 21.Kg8) and this position is that I have moved the black Knight from f6 to b6.
[ http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1139475 ]
Crafty gives the line: Rxa1 Kxf7 Rhe1 c5 Re4...[41m nodes : scores 3.47]
However, I was wondering how many other "human" players would disagree. In my eyes there is a powerful imbetween move crafty missed.
Nh6+ gxh6 Rxa1 Bg4 ...
the idea being, to spend a tempo in order to damage blacks pawn structure. [doubled up h-pawns]
Crafty on the other hand, seems to think this variation is marginally weaker [60m nodes: scores 3.25]
This is only a small difference but it does mean that, had crafty beeing playing white in this game, Nh6+ would have been 2nd choice and therefore not played.
which begs the question: who thinks crafty is right? and also, who else would play Nh6+ in this position?
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundHis question isn't a matter of whether to take the queen or not. His question is should he play Nh6+ 1st, ruining Black's pawn structure and then take the queen.
I'd take the queen, no question. . .maybe that's why i'm rated so low, but every bone in my body says "take the big kickass piece of material".
And I have an answer for him: In the game he quoted White must take the queen because after Nh6+ PxN, RxQ Black has Ne4+! ruining White's pawn structure and eliminating the black-squared bishop.
However, by changing the position Shinidoki is asking for advice on a position that never existed. With that in mind, I wonder if he put the correct position into his chess engine? I'm not going to spend the time to chase down a "what-if" scenario.
Originally posted by arrakisWith respect, i knew exactly what his question was, and answered it honestly.
His question isn't a matter of whether to take the queen or not. His question is should he play Nh6+ 1st, ruining Black's pawn structure and then take the queen.
And I have an answer for him: In the game he quoted White must take the queen because after Nh6+ PxN, RxQ Black has Ne4+! ruining White's pawn structure and eliminating the black-squared bishop. ...[text shortened]... into his chess engine? I'm not going to spend the time to chase down a "what-if" scenario.
Originally posted by arrakisthe entire reason I didn't use the oringinal game (and moved the Knight) was because of Ne4+.....
His question isn't a matter of whether to take the queen or not. His question is should he play Nh6+ 1st, ruining Black's pawn structure and then take the queen.
And I have an answer for him: In the game he quoted White must take the queen because after Nh6+ PxN, RxQ Black has Ne4+! ruining White's pawn structure and eliminating the black-squared bishop. ...[text shortened]... into his chess engine? I'm not going to spend the time to chase down a "what-if" scenario.
-- I don't see how solving this is any different from trying to solve any other made up position.
and I put crafty on both positions, the one posted and after 21. kg8 of tal's game.