1 edit
I already posted that game,loser.
Then you ask why I won't play you ten times as you already requested.
Why should I,after your pathetic behaviour in our games?
If you win a piece you start insulting,if you lose a piece you start accusing of che@ing.
No,thanks,I'd rather play Damiano's defense for the rest of my life than playing again such an arrogant patzer.
You told me I was using an engine:here we go,the games are here so that everyone can take a look at my "che@ing" and at your cretinery.
Originally posted by XanthosNZI only questioned whether he was, because his play was definitely much weaker up until the point. That bishop-Queen pin was his only tactical flurry in the game. I am done with this argument. I also told him that I was perhaps overreacting, but still I'm not the one who makes a thread out of the story of two games. I still think it's slightly odd he suddenly comes up with a tactical flurry when the rest of the time he was playing weakly. Oh well.
And accusing a player of cheating just because you lost shows your complete lack of class.
Originally posted by sonhouseWell, I don't know. I think I just might have blundered, sonhouse... Right after he took the rook, I should have not relaxed. I should have played Qh5 and attacked the Queenside with knight and Queen, anything to prevent the bishop's attack on that a6-f1 diagonal. I should have realized his Queen had that open c-file. But, it doesn't matter. I still wonder. Even in the game I won, he suddenly attempts tactical prowess, and it looks like something a computer would do. But, I can't say he's cheating, because I don't know if he really is. And, it's not the thing to do to state he was cheating. That's just not the thing to do either.
Yes, game 1576313 shows your incredible superiority and it shows
he HAD to be cheating to win in such a subtle game......
Originally posted by powershakerThanks for continuing to make a fool of yourself.
Well, I don't know. I think I just might have blundered, sonhouse... Right after he took the rook, I should have not relaxed. I should have played Qh5 and attacked the Queenside with knight and Queen, anything to prevent the bishop's attack on that a6-f1 diagonal. I should have realized his Queen had that open c-file. But, it doesn't matter. I s ...[text shortened]... d, it's not the thing to do to state he was cheating. That's just not the thing to do either.
I even missed the checkmate in two at move 31........31...Qd1+ 32.Qf1,Qxf1#
Stop babbling nonsense and producing lame excuses,you played worse than me,deal with it.
Originally posted by RavelloYeah, I was laughing when you missed that minor checkmate. That "huge" blunder and lack of chess vision reinforces the idea that something was amiss in that game!
Thanks for continuing to make a fool of yourself.
I even missed the checkmate in two at move 31........31...Qd1+ 32.Qf1,Qxf1#
Stop babbling nonsense and producing lame excuses,you played worse than me,deal with it.
Originally posted by RavelloI never said you were using an engine. But, since that came out of your mouth, maybe you were. In order to know the truth, merely read between the lines of what other people say themselves. 🙂
I already posted that game,loser.
Then you ask why I won't play you ten times as you already requested.
Why should I,after your pathetic behaviour in our games?
If you win a piece you start insulting,if you lose a piece you start accusing of che@ing.
No,thanks,I'd rather play Damiano's defense for the rest of my life than playing again such an arr ...[text shortened]... go,the games are here so that everyone can take a look at my "che@ing" and at your cretinery.
If you believe I was che@ing there are the Game moderators here,I encourage you to send the game and they will analize it,otherwise shut up.
By the way didn't you have Chessmaster,as you said in the other thread?
If so,you can analize the game yourself and stop saying this crap.
As soon as you wo the exchange you started to send crappy messages,then you say I'm "insulting and full of myself"??
You're just one of the many sore losers playing chess on the net,face it.
1 edit
Originally posted by RavelloWorse than you? LOL! I think I'll just let the games speak for themselves. One of the two shows how superior I was to your game, Ravioli. Live with it! You had your chance to play a 10 game match, and blew it. I was going to give everything I had in me to that match! But, you ran off scared, and started creating this useless thread, which is pointless and argumentative. Mama mia! Now that's Italian!
Thanks for continuing to make a fool of yourself.
I even missed the checkmate in two at move 31........31...Qd1+ 32.Qf1,Qxf1#
Stop babbling nonsense and producing lame excuses,you played worse than me,deal with it.
Originally posted by RavelloI just sensed something was amiss. That's I posted that. And, I was frustrated.
Noooooo,you never said it!
My God,you really sare dumb,aren't you?
Here is one of your crappy messages:
From: powershaker
Date: Nov 22 22:53
Subject: You got lucky
>You got so lucky! I had you crushed! I can't believe I'm losing that game to you. I could have easily gotten out of that in a real tournament with a clock. But, I'm not hard ...[text shortened]... ost your other messages?
It's only embarassing for yourself if you continue along those lines.