3 edits
How to stay under 2000 for ever (in both CC/online chess)? Do some of the following :-
- play the Smith-Morra Gambit or King Gambit as white in all games
- play 300 games simultaneously and in each give 5 minutes of thought to each move.
- Target weak players and delete challenges of those within 200 points of you.
- Never hand analyse your games, always use Fritz
- Delete games where your "pet openings" are not played.
3 edits
Originally posted by z00t😵
How to stay under 2000 for ever? Do some of the following :-
- play the Smith-Morra Gambit or King Gambit as white in all games
- play 300 games simultaneously and in each give 5 minutes of thought to each move.
- Target weak players and delete challenges of those within 200 points of you.
Added 4 open invites.
1500-1800.😀
1582, 1560, 1518 + 1680
2 edits
Originally posted by z00tMichael Adams has played (& won) with the Smith-Morra gambit
How to stay under 2000 for ever? Do some of the following :-
- play the Smith-Morra Gambit or King Gambit as white in all games
- play 300 games simultaneously and in each give 5 minutes of thought to each move.
- Target weak players and delete challenges of those within 200 points of you.
He is currently rated 2735
Ken Smith was 2400+ I think
I bow to your greater knowledge though😛
Originally posted by z00tOK, lemme see.
How to stay under 2000 for ever (in both CC/online chess)? Do some of the following :-
- play the Smith-Morra Gambit or King Gambit as white in all games
- play 300 games simultaneously and in each give 5 minutes of thought to each move.
- Target weak players and delete challenges of those within 200 points of you.
- Never hand analyse your games, always use Fritz
- Delete games where your "pet openings" are not played.
I never play the Smith-Morra Gambit or King's Gambit. So far so good. We'll call that one plus then. I don't play 300 games simultaneously (30 would be hard work for me) but 5 minutes thought is about right for me. Ummm call that a half, so one and a half so far. I don't target anyone, weak or strong and haven't deleted a challenge at all so far. Two and a half then. I never hand analyse my games but don't use Fritz or any other computerised contraption. I could use my ancient Novag Sola but I think that might rather defeat the object of analysis (have you noticed you can't spell analyse without spelling anal?) So another half then, three so far. I don't have a pet opening (the vet fees were getting ridiculous) and have never deleted a game yet. A whole one that time for a total of four. Well four out of five isn't bad. I reckon that explains why I seem to approach 2000 but never reach it. I am asymptotic to 2000.
What is this fixation with 2000? Does something wonderful happen when you reach the magic figure?
1 edit
Originally posted by climb2highYeah most people play for fun.
I hardly spend more than 30 seconds on a move. I know I will never get over 1600, but i still enjoy the game 😉
Strange that z00t chose 2 of the most exciting, least compromising openings to criticise.
Paul Morphy was such a bore *yawns*
Lets all shop at IKEA & play 1.d4 eh?
Originally posted by z00tWhy are you so against the kings gambit when so many great players have played it?
How to stay under 2000 for ever (in both CC/online chess)? Do some of the following :-
- play the Smith-Morra Gambit or King Gambit as white in all games
- play 300 games simultaneously and in each give 5 minutes of thought to each move.
- Target weak players and delete challenges of those within 200 points of you.
- Never hand analyse your games, always use Fritz
- Delete games where your "pet openings" are not played.
Surely by limiting your opening repetoire you can concentrate on your middle and endgame?
Originally posted by z00tWell you do seem to be an expert at staying below 2000.
How to stay under 2000 for ever (in both CC/online chess)? Do some of the following :-
- play the Smith-Morra Gambit or King Gambit as white in all games
- play 300 games simultaneously and in each give 5 minutes of thought to each move.
- Target weak players and delete challenges of those within 200 points of you.
- Never hand analyse your games, always use Fritz
- Delete games where your "pet openings" are not played.
BTW, check out every game Northern Lad (6th on this site, 2300+ rating) has played after 1.e4 e5.
Originally posted by climb2highYou will indeed remain below 1600 if you carry on doing that. Your grandson could be born, he learns how to play properly and gets over 2000 while you are still where you are. If its any consolation you might have passed the 100,000-move mark.
I hardly spend more than 30 seconds on a move. I know I will never get over 1600, but i still enjoy the game 😉
Very nice articles indeed (found out about it through the below chessgames.com link):
http://www.chessville.com/instruction/Openings/Smith-Morra/instr_open_Smith_Morra_Part1.htm
Instructional game w/commentary:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1410099
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1070396
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1250832
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1141196
Game 1853471
Game 468370
Game 412080
The Smith-Morra may help teach the value of dynamic compensation, and although the line requires accuracy, there is no known refutation for the opening.