30 Jan '14 23:41>
That is the question...
Originally posted by greenpawn34Exactly. I would not set a losing trap against a player of your strength but I would consider it against a player of low rating in the hope they do not see heir winning move but take the bait. Thus, my opponents rating would influence my play.
That Geoff Chandler guy is a cretin, don't go near he anything he writes or suggests.
Hi twohybrid
Always go for the trap - the more you set the more chance of pulling off a cheapo win.
The two or three trap trick is the best to go for.
They spot the first trap, relax and then fall for the 2nd or 3rd one.
Cheapo wins are better than sound tech ...[text shortened]... offering the the a1 Rook.} 14... Qxb2 15. Re8+ Kg7 16. Rxg8# {A brilliant 4 piece mate.} [/pgn]
Originally posted by greenpawn34No 1...Qxc4, por que?
That Geoff Chandler guy is a cretin, don't go near he anything he writes or suggests.
Hi twohybrid
Always go for the trap - the more you set the more chance of pulling off a cheapo win.
The two or three trap trick is the best to go for.
They spot the first trap, relax and then fall for the 2nd or 3rd one.
Cheapo wins are better than sound tech ...[text shortened]... offering the the a1 Rook.} 14... Qxb2 15. Re8+ Kg7 16. Rxg8# {A brilliant 4 piece mate.} [/pgn]
Originally posted by twohybridWhy play a trap against a weaker player - you should beat them anyway!
Exactly. I would not set a losing trap against a player of your strength but I would consider it against a player of low rating in the hope they do not see heir winning move but take the bait. Thus, my opponents rating would influence my play.
.