Originally posted by Wildfirebecause he has style. He realised that his position is lost and he resigned like a gentleman.
Can anyone tell me why my opponent decided to resign this game?
Game 1254665
Originally posted by BowmannNot ordinarily, no. My comment was just in general, not really in specific reference to that position, since I couldn't see it. But in general, 3 pawns can be considered practically a whole piece, as far as material deficit. And jusuh's post made it clear that the losing side had no compenstion for the 3 (make it 4) pawns.
You make comments on positions you can't see?