Go back
Vishy Interview

Vishy Interview

Only Chess

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
01 Dec 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

The thing is Magnus is a different opponent with a different style and I could not figure him out. He also has a radical approach to chess and I couldn't find him out though I tried a strategy to neutralise his stronger points and it didn't work," Anand admitted.

"I did play aggressive chess but Carlsen has made a career for himself by playing imposing chess. He is a versatile and diversed player with lot of resources and at times I forced him into aggressive position but couldn't manage to bring him out of his comfort zone," Anand said.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/i-was-outplayed-by-carlsen-says-viswanathan-anand/436862-5-23.html

greenpawn34

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
43363
Clock
01 Dec 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

"....but couldn't manage to bring him out of his comfort zone,"

I think Vishy is right. But there are other players out there who might fair better.
Hungry players.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
01 Dec 13
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I thought both players played incredibly safe chess. After all, wasn't that the reason for those draws? I didn't see much aggressive or "radical"chess.

greenpawn34

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
43363
Clock
01 Dec 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

After the first handful of dipping toes into the water the match took off.

Riskless chess was to be expected with such a short match.
Financially it may be the future.
First to 6 wins and no one knows when it will end.
The Moscow Marathon proved to an embarrassing financial disaster.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
01 Dec 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
"....but couldn't manage to bring him out of his comfort zone,"

I think Vishy is right. But there are other players out there who might fair better.
Hungry players.
Anand states that Carlsen has made a career of desert dry 'technical positions', whatever that means, that he plays long games knowing that his opponent may make some mistake upon which he will capitalise. A kind of risk free chess, which is really quite interesting. Yes there are other players, Karjakin, Caruana who will challenge hopefully.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
01 Dec 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by vivify
I thought both players played incredibly safe chess. After all, wasn't that the reason for those draws? I didn't see much aggressive or "radical"chess.
Yes, I have to admit that i got thoroughly bored with this world championship and did not even watch games nine and ten.

KnightStalker47

Joined
12 Nov 06
Moves
74414
Clock
02 Dec 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think Kramnik will be the next challenger. Just think about it, if this years candidates had gone slightly differently (Like if the tiebreak was least loses instead of most wins.) then there is no doubt in my mind that Kramnik would have been this years WC.

With the way he was playing at the candidates and with his match experience, I think he will be able to give magnus a good run. If he gets the chance.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
02 Dec 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightStalker47
I think Kramnik will be the next challenger. Just think about it, if this years candidates had gone slightly differently (Like if the tiebreak was least loses instead of most wins.) then there is no doubt in my mind that Kramnik would have been this years WC.

With the way he was playing at the candidates and with his match experience, I think he will be able to give magnus a good run. If he gets the chance.
My hope is that it will be one of the young guys, but you may be correct, Anands attempts with 1.e4 were easily thwarted and clearly he got the strategy for the match all wrong, perhaps someone like Kramnik really would do better, someone that likes endgames and plays them really well.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
02 Dec 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
My hope is that it will be one of the young guys, but you may be correct, Anands attempts with 1.e4 were easily thwarted and clearly he got the strategy for the match all wrong, perhaps someone like Kramnik really would do better, someone that likes endgames and plays them really well.
What is MC's score vs Kramnik?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.