Go back
weird exchange

weird exchange

Only Chess

eg

Joined
19 May 06
Moves
2230
Clock
12 Dec 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

is it a good idea to trade a bishop and a knight to take a rook+1 pawn??

w
Chocolate Expert

Cocoa Mountains

Joined
26 Nov 06
Moves
19249
Clock
12 Dec 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by el gil
is it a good idea to trade a bishop and a knight to take a rook+1 pawn??
Generally, no.

Assuming you trade down into the endgame, usually the combined power of the bishop and knight overpower the lone rook.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
12 Dec 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by el gil
is it a good idea to trade a bishop and a knight to take a rook+1 pawn??
The answer to all this kind of questions (what is most worth? a xxx or a yyy?) is of course - It depends of the situation. There is no general advice here that covers all situations and positions.

A pawn that is about to promote is worth as much as a queen and it can save the game to sacrifice a rook to prevent it. just an example of many.

The value of any position si not worth only the sum of the pieces on board. You have to acount of king safety, open lines, interplay between pieces, center occupation and a lot of othere properties of the position. Fritz and like calculate all these things together and decides if it helps the situation to exchange (in this case a bishop and a knight to a rook+1 pawn). Fritz know how to calculate all properties very quickly, we mere humans has to rely to intuition and experience, sometimes on courage and psychology.

So the short answer to these kind of questions is - It depends...

MR

Joined
19 Jun 06
Moves
847
Clock
12 Dec 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by el gil
is it a good idea to trade a bishop and a knight to take a rook+1 pawn??
FabianFnas is correct, in that the answer to your question always depends on the specific board position. But if you need a general answer to your question, then wittywonka's answer is also correct. Generally, it's not a good idea.

Larry Kaufman's 1999 Chess Life article, The Evaluation of Material Imbalances, has a paragraph related to your question. (The section titled Two Minor Pieces vs. Rook And Pawn(s).) Larry also gives an example of a trade in the opening where it's not a good trade for the side giving up the bishop and knight. You can read Larry's article on the link below.

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/danheisman/Articles/evaluation_of_material_imbalance.htm

m

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
4432
Clock
12 Dec 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

If you meant this type of exchange, no.

Game 3945169
Game 4285619

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
12 Dec 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by el gil
is it a good idea to trade a bishop and a knight to take a rook+1 pawn??
Probably not, since it takes two of your best developed pieces out of action and generally speeds the opponent's development. But in chess, there are no absolutes -- it all depends on the position on the board.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.