Go back
what are gambits?

what are gambits?

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

please explain with examples

Vote Up
Vote Down

When,in the opening,one side offers a pawn for quick development and attacking chances this is called a gambit.
Examples:
1.e4,e5 2.f4 King's gambit,probably the best know gambit in chess.
1.d4,d5 2.c4 Queen's gambit
1.d4,Nf6 2.c4,e5 Budapest gambit

Sir Lot.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Also, remember, that a pawn IS a pawn, and that you better be able to attain good results from the loss of it - thus the name for that type of opening.

Another popular gambit, and one of my favourites, is the Evans Gambit: 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4

The basic intention behind the move 4. b4 is to give up a pawn in order to secure a strong centre and bear down on Black's weak-point, f7. Often, the idea of Ba3, preventing black from castling, is also in the air.

Vote Up
Vote Down

i never saw this one anywhere, i started doing it on my own, but am not syaing i was the first to invent it. anyone know anything about it?
me as white
e4, e5
Kf3, Kc6
Bb5, a6
Bxc6, c6
Kxe5

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zakkwylder
i never saw this one anywhere, i started doing it on my own, but am not syaing i was the first to invent it. anyone know anything about it?
me as white
e4, e5
Kf3, Kc6
Bb5, a6
Bxc6, c6
Kxe5
I take it your K's are N's.And what happens at move 4?
4....,bxc6 or 4....,dxc6?I used to play the former in my early years,but the latter is the normal,and prolly the only good,continuation.I wouldn't call either a gambit though.

Sir Lot.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Qd4 gets the pawn back 😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ketchuplover
Qd4 gets the pawn back 😀
Only if 4....,dxc6

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SirLoseALot
Only if 4....,dxc6
Right, but if 4....bxc6, then 5....Qe7 still wins the pawn back. Zakkwylder, the line you showed us is called the Ruy Lopez Exchange Variation. You should know that the idea behind playing this is not to win the e5 pawn, because as you've seen Black gets it back and in fact does so with full equality. The idea behind the Exchange Variation is that White will have the advantage in almost any endgame that is reached, provided the pawn structure doesn't change. So White just has to negate any advantage Black could gain with the two bishops, and just calmly trade off pieces into the endgame. Sounds simple enough, but it isn't theoretically the best way for White to play the Ruy. However, it's good for less experienced players because plans are pretty easy to find.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TheWizardOfOz
Another popular gambit, and one of my favourites, is the Evans Gambit: 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4

The basic intention behind the move 4. b4 is to give up a pawn in order to secure a strong centre and bear down on Black's weak-point, f7. Often, the idea of Ba3, preventing black from castling, is also in the air.
I agree, the Evans is one of the strongest gambits I know, it gives White almost complete control of the center, leaving Black heavily underdeveloped and with a very cramped position. I remember ReelEmInReid used to play it quite alot... can't say I have though, as I almost never open with 1.e4. 🙂

O.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LivingLegend
I agree, the Evans is one of the strongest gambits I know, it gives White almost complete control of the center, leaving Black heavily underdeveloped and with a very cramped position. I remember ReelEmInReid used to play it quite alot... can't say I have though, as I almost never open with 1.e4. 🙂

O.
I remember a good beating I took by the hands of ReelEmInReid,when he used the Evans.
Nice game,good player.

Vote Up
Vote Down

the queen isnt able to take a pawn without losing the queen. the aim is in this situation is to get a pawn and the opponent has a doubled pawn. sure i trade a bishop for a night, which is detrimental to me for im better with bishops, but i get a better offensive stance being 1 pawn up and my opponent having a doubled file.

Vote Up
Vote Down

case in point, http://gameknot.com/chess.pl?bd=1811100&r=411
my opponent has yet to take the bishop, but once he does, he has a doubled pawn and i get the pawn with my knight.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zakkwylder
case in point, http://gameknot.com/chess.pl?bd=1811100&r=411
my opponent has yet to take the bishop, but once he does, he has a doubled pawn and i get the pawn with my knight.
after 4....,dxc6 5.Nxe5,Qd4 6.Nf3,Qxe4+ bmack does not lose the queen!Black wins the pawn back!Why do you think the queen can't get the pawn???

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SirLoseALot
after 4....,dxc6 5.Nxe5,Qd4 6.Nf3,Qxe4+ bmack does not lose the queen!Black wins the pawn back!Why do you think the queen can't get the pawn???
im not doing dxc6, ikm playing as white, bishop takes c6. black returns by taking the bishop with a pawn. theerfore, my knight on f3 takes the black pawn on e5. again i say, i am 1 pawn up and my opponent has a doubled file. take a look at the webpage i posetd and youll see.