Go back
Where did it go wrong?

Where did it go wrong?

Only Chess

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
11 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm feeling smug cos I just beat a higher graded player ... but where did he go wrong?

Is this a known 'trap'?

Game 5194317

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
11 Jul 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
I'm feeling smug cos I just beat a higher graded player ... but where did he go wrong?

Is this a known 'trap'?

Game 5194317
7. ... Be6 would have been interesting.

e.g.
8. Nbc4 Nbd7

I did a simul against some complete beginners yesterday and won a quarter of the games with mates based on Bc5, Nf6-g4, Bxf2 mate (I was Black in all the games).

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
I'm feeling smug cos I just beat a higher graded player ... but where did he go wrong?

Is this a known 'trap'?

Game 5194317
I'd say 4. ... Bg4? got him into trouble. After 5. Nfe5 only chance is to play 5. ... Bc8 (5. ... Be6 is bad because it blocks the e-pawn) 6. Qb3 e6. But still white would be ahead in development.

3. Na3 seemed weird to me. If you sacrificed a pawn to get his d-pawn away from the center, then grab the center by 3. e4. Your bishop would still attack the pawn and you'd have a pawn in the center, instead of a knight at the side.

In my opinion you played the opening poorly but he even worse. However, I'm not an expert, so don't take my post too seriously.

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
11 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kbaumen
3. Na3 seemed weird to me. If you sacrificed a pawn to get his d-pawn away from the center, then grab the center by 3. e4. Your bishop would still attack the pawn and you'd have a pawn in the center, instead of a knight at the side.
3.Na3 is perfectly OK, it is one of the standard ways that White gets his pawn back. The one which surprised me the first time I saw it was 3.Qa4+, but that too is perfectly playable. I don't think 2. ... dxc4 is Black's best way of playing against this line.

k

Sigulda, Latvia

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
4048
Clock
11 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Fat Lady
3.Na3 is perfectly OK, it is one of the standard ways that White gets his pawn back. The one which surprised me the first time I saw it was 3.Qa4+, but that too is perfectly playable. I don't think 2. ... dxc4 is Black's best way of playing against this line.
Could be, I'm no expert. But what about 3. e4? I'd still think I'd play 3. e4.

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
Clock
11 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kbaumen
Could be, I'm no expert. But what about 3. e4? I'd still think I'd play 3. e4.
I've never seen 3.e4 played (3.e3 is common), but it looks interesting.

e.g.

1.Nf3 d5
2.c4 dxc4
3.e4 Nf6
4.Bxc4! Nxe4?
5.Qa4+ Nd7
6. Bxf7+

looks OK for White.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
11 Jul 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kbaumen
I'd say 4. ... Bg4? got him into trouble. After 5. Nfe5 only chance is to play 5. ... Bc8 (5. ... Be6 is bad because it blocks the e-pawn) 6. Qb3 e6. But still white would be ahead in development.

3. Na3 seemed weird to me. If you sacrificed a pawn to get his d-pawn away from the center, then grab the center by 3. e4. Your bishop would still attack the pa ...[text shortened]... g poorly but he even worse. However, I'm not an expert, so don't take my post too seriously.
3. Na3 is a very well establihed line! (Reti's own invention I believe.)

See http://www.365chess.com/opening.php

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.