Go back
Why do we have knights...

Why do we have knights...

Only Chess

Marinkatomb
wotagr8game

tbc

Joined
18 Feb 04
Moves
61941
Clock
24 Dec 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

...But not spiders? Looking at the way the knight moves, wouldn't it be better if they were a spider? 😕

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
25 Dec 14

Originally posted by Marinkatomb
...But not spiders? Looking at the way the knight moves, wouldn't it be better if they were a spider? 😕
Because they'd escape the board, weave their web above your bed, and drop on your head just as you were trying to fall asleep, thus checkmating you.

Sleep tight, now...

KnightStalker47

Joined
12 Nov 06
Moves
74414
Clock
25 Dec 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Marinkatomb
...But not spiders? Looking at the way the knight moves, wouldn't it be better if they were a spider? 😕
A spider? Why not a dog, because it goes doglegged.

Marinkatomb
wotagr8game

tbc

Joined
18 Feb 04
Moves
61941
Clock
26 Dec 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

What about Reindeer? Reindeer to reindeer three checkmate!! 😵

s
The Mighty Messenger

The Wood of N'Kai

Joined
13 Dec 03
Moves
156184
Clock
26 Dec 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Lay off the eggnog, you lot!

caissad4
Child of the Novelty

San Antonio, Texas

Joined
08 Mar 04
Moves
618778
Clock
26 Dec 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Marinkatomb
...But not spiders? Looking at the way the knight moves, wouldn't it be better if they were a spider? 😕
I thought they were originally elephants.

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
27 Dec 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by caissad4
I thought they were originally elephants.
No, that's the bishops. Knights were always knights, or at least cavalrists.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
27 Dec 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Shallow Blue
No, that's the bishops. Knights were always knights, or at least cavalrists.
I thought rooks were originally elephants?

Bishops were boats.

??

edit: Apparently that theory is not widely accepted. 😳

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturaji

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
28 Dec 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
I thought rooks were originally elephants?

Bishops were boats.
Bishops were elephants, rooks were chariots - that's why they go that fast. As that Pikiwedia article notes, in the four-player version, the rooks, not the bishops, were boats; but I've read no source which takes Piki's theory that one was the origin of the two-player game seriously any more. Everybody now agrees that it was the other way 'round.

Paul Leggett
Chess Librarian

The Stacks

Joined
21 Aug 09
Moves
114058
Clock
28 Dec 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

The relationship between man and woman was the origin of the game. It's always been about mating.

Shallow Blue

Joined
18 Jan 07
Moves
12477
Clock
28 Dec 14

Originally posted by Paul Leggett
The relationship between man and woman was the origin of the game. It's always been about mating.
Meaning that the Indians were all homosexual, and it took mediaeval Europeans to discover that you could have sex with women as well?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.