1. Standard memberMarinkatomb
    wotagr8game
    tbc
    Joined
    18 Feb '04
    Moves
    61941
    24 Dec '14 22:10
    ...But not spiders? Looking at the way the knight moves, wouldn't it be better if they were a spider? 😕
  2. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12447
    25 Dec '14 01:47
    Originally posted by Marinkatomb
    ...But not spiders? Looking at the way the knight moves, wouldn't it be better if they were a spider? 😕
    Because they'd escape the board, weave their web above your bed, and drop on your head just as you were trying to fall asleep, thus checkmating you.

    Sleep tight, now...
  3. Joined
    12 Nov '06
    Moves
    74414
    25 Dec '14 12:54
    Originally posted by Marinkatomb
    ...But not spiders? Looking at the way the knight moves, wouldn't it be better if they were a spider? 😕
    A spider? Why not a dog, because it goes doglegged.
  4. Standard memberMarinkatomb
    wotagr8game
    tbc
    Joined
    18 Feb '04
    Moves
    61941
    26 Dec '14 00:21
    What about Reindeer? Reindeer to reindeer three checkmate!! 😵
  5. Standard membersundown316
    The Mighty Messenger
    The Wood of N'Kai
    Joined
    13 Dec '03
    Moves
    156184
    26 Dec '14 05:19
    Lay off the eggnog, you lot!
  6. Standard membercaissad4
    Child of the Novelty
    San Antonio, Texas
    Joined
    08 Mar '04
    Moves
    618640
    26 Dec '14 05:34
    Originally posted by Marinkatomb
    ...But not spiders? Looking at the way the knight moves, wouldn't it be better if they were a spider? 😕
    I thought they were originally elephants.
  7. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12447
    27 Dec '14 15:29
    Originally posted by caissad4
    I thought they were originally elephants.
    No, that's the bishops. Knights were always knights, or at least cavalrists.
  8. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    27 Dec '14 21:381 edit
    Originally posted by Shallow Blue
    No, that's the bishops. Knights were always knights, or at least cavalrists.
    I thought rooks were originally elephants?

    Bishops were boats.

    ??

    edit: Apparently that theory is not widely accepted. 😳

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturaji
  9. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12447
    28 Dec '14 10:55
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    I thought rooks were originally elephants?

    Bishops were boats.
    Bishops were elephants, rooks were chariots - that's why they go that fast. As that Pikiwedia article notes, in the four-player version, the rooks, not the bishops, were boats; but I've read no source which takes Piki's theory that one was the origin of the two-player game seriously any more. Everybody now agrees that it was the other way 'round.
  10. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113572
    28 Dec '14 17:54
    The relationship between man and woman was the origin of the game. It's always been about mating.
  11. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12447
    28 Dec '14 19:42
    Originally posted by Paul Leggett
    The relationship between man and woman was the origin of the game. It's always been about mating.
    Meaning that the Indians were all homosexual, and it took mediaeval Europeans to discover that you could have sex with women as well?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree