Originally posted by SwissGambit talzamir is right. If no symbol is placed between digits, they read as a single number. But I'm not sure why that's ambiguous - what would you do with the numbers with no symbol between them if they are distinct numbers and not just digits? For example, what does the expression 1 2 3 = 2002 even mean?
The instruction said "place + or * (plus or multiply) symbols as needed between the digits on the left side". There are 9 digits on the LHS. On the other hand, 123, for example, is not a digit. The way I chose to analyze it, this requires separating the 9 digits with 8 operators, as in 1*2+3+4*5*6*7*8+9. There would be no "1 2 3" to assign meaning to. But it's your puzzle, and a good one too. Your specification stands.
Originally posted by JS357 The instruction said "place + or * (plus or multiply) symbols as needed between the digits on the left side". There are 9 digits on the LHS. On the other hand, 123, for example, is not a digit. The way I chose to analyze it, this requires separating the 9 digits with 8 operators, as in 1*2+3+4*5*6*7*8+9. There would be no "1 2 3" to assign meaning to. But it's your puzzle, and a good one too. Your specification stands.
Moreover, with your specification, there is no solution. Therefore, his specification is the correct one by necessity as well as by origin.
Originally posted by Shallow Blue Moreover, with your specification, there is no solution. Therefore, his specification is the correct one by necessity as well as by origin.
Richard
I believe you are correct about there being no solutions using my specification.