22 Aug '06 07:26>
Originally posted by smomofoI would go with 1/5 also
Actually, it might be 1/5.
Originally posted by ThudanBlunderThey're all equally likely (assuming a random drawing of course), and there are 4 possibilities, so each one has a probability of 1/4. If the drawing was not completely random, the problem should have said so, otherwise any answer can be justified with a cock-eyed backstory.
But there is no a priori evidence for that. 🙄
Originally posted by Keltamaksa1 out of 8
Here's a little snack-sized puzzle. I saw this on a science magazine some years ago and modified it a little.
You're in a lab of a mad scientist. You see two identical containers on the table but you can't see their contents. When you look at the scientist, you notice that he's holding a fresh human brain in his hands. "One of those containers", he say ...[text shortened]... ainer he had picked. "With what probability does that jar have another brain in it?"
Originally posted by PBE6The question is how were they put in the box?
They're all equally likely (assuming a random drawing of course), and there are 4 possibilities, so each one has a probability of 1/4.
Originally posted by KeltamaksaThis statement tells us nothing of the probability of there being either a liver or a brain in the container. Without that information, the problem is not solvable.
"One of those containers", he says, "has either a liver or a brain in it. The other one is empty."
Originally posted by ThudanBlunderIn this problem, the box contains "exactly two coins", so you can't fudge it by placing only one coin in the box.
The question is how were they put in the box?
For example, you throw a die.
If it comes up a 1 or 2, you put SS in the box;
Otherwise, you put SG in the box.
(Or you could do it the other way round. Or use another method to get whatever probabilities you choose.)
Without any a priori information on how the coins were put in the box, any purel ...[text shortened]... /2 and 2/3. However, there is also 'not enough information' which is the answer I agree with.
Originally posted by SiteNineAgain, you're reading too much into the question. Although technically the probability of the brain or the liver being in the container could be anything between 0 and 1, it's reasonable to assume that the chances are 50-50 for each.
This statement tells us nothing of the probability of there being either a liver or a brain in the container. Without that information, the problem is not solvable.
Originally posted by aging blitzerI tried running an Excel simulation on the brain/liver puzzle just to confirm the answer. In the simulation, I seeded Jar 1 with either a brain (RAND()0.5), and then chose Jar 1 (RAND()0.5) at random to add the brain. A random jar was then chosen in the same way, and a random organ was chosen. If the jar was empty, the result was "empty"; if the jar contained only one organ, that organ was chosen; and if the jar contained two organs, one was chosen at random (50% chance of either one being chosen).
I would go with 1/5 also
Originally posted by ThudanBlunderImpossible to answer correctly since sex is determined by genetics. Both the man and the woman can have weak or strong biases toward male or female children that would skew the probability.
A man has exactly two children. At least one of them is a boy.
What is the probability that both his children are boys?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A woman has exactly two children. The older of the two is a boy.
What is the probability that both her children are boys?