If one takes a group of 64 individuals, and asked them for their birthdates (day and month, not year), the chances of there being at least one match (at least two persons born on the same day of the same month), is 99% (actually about 995/1000).
"Logic" dictates that is should be 64/365 (or 1 in 6ish). Note, I say "logic".
Now, can a mathematically inclined person please explain to me in layman terms, why this is? (the 99% thing, not the "logic" thing!)
Oh, also, please will anyone else share any "weird" coincidences of a mathematical nature? (Not "One time, when my aunt was at the store, you will NEVER believe who she saw, buying tooth paste, no less"😉
alcra
Originally posted by AlcraOK, here is with some simplifications (366 equally probable birthdays):
If one takes a group of 64 individuals, and asked them for their birthdates (day and month, not year), the chances of there being at least one match (at least two persons born on the same day of the same month), is 99% (actually about 995/100 ...[text shortened]... NEVER believe who she saw, buying tooth paste, no less"😉
alcra
The probability of having 'at least one double' = 1- the probability of having no doubles at all. Which is
for one student: 366/366
for two students: 366*365/366*366
for three students: 366*365*364/366*366*366]
etc.
for n students:366*365* .... (366-n)/366^n
or, writtten otherwise: 366! / [(366-n)! * 366^n]
for 64 students : 366!/(362! * 366^64) = 0.29% chance of no doubles,
or 99.71 % chance of at least one double
Another example: you expect more than 50% of the classes with 23 students to have at least one double birthday
Originally posted by THUDandBLUNDERFor large k, the following approach might be useful:
Ever tried working it out for at least k people with the same birthday? 🙄
Let Dk(x1,...,xk) be a polynomial which takes the value zero if x1 = x2 = ... = xk, and is not zero otherwise (eg the sum over i,j dinstinct of (xi-xj)^2). Let Pk be the product (over all subsets of size k of your set of people) of Dk. Then the probability you're looking for is prob(Pk = 0). This looks a bit ugly, but since Pk is a polynomial in independent random variables with a known distribution (assume uniform, to first approximation) it should be possible to deal with as long as you have a computer handy.
Originally posted by Mephisto2Well, *that* was easy 'nuff!
The probability of having 'at least one double' = 1- the probability of having no doubles at all. Which is
for one student: 366/366
for two students: 366*365/366*366
for three students: 366*365*364/366*366*366]
etc.
for n students:366*365* .... (366-n)/366^n
or, writtten otherwise: 366! / [(366-n)! * 366^n]
for 64 students : 366!/(362! * 366^64) = 0.29% chance of no doubles,
or 99.71 % chance of at least one double