1. Standard memberPBE6
    Bananarama
    False berry
    Joined
    14 Feb '04
    Moves
    28719
    04 Apr '06 15:061 edit
    Originally posted by uzless
    I'd like to add a further complication to any attempted solution, just to be an ass.
    Mission accomplished. 🙄

    EDIT - Hehe
  2. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    14 Apr '06 04:48
    Originally posted by uzless
    my my, we have been busy haven't we?

    Since you've raised some real world problems, I'd like to add a further complication to any attempted solution, just to be an ass. Here's a list of variables not accounted for which would lead to minor errors in the solution:

    1. Evaporation rate of water into the air above the tank. Some of the water will evapora ...[text shortened]... since 2 or 3 vortexes will be partially competing for the same water.

    Food for thought.
    Interesting. So you are assuming an open tank. If it were a closed tank, there would not be a whole lot of evaporation, it would re-condense back into the water. Also if the vortexes slowed down the drain rate, it would speed up the filling of the water so tending to compensate for the alleged vortex interferance.
    Water for thought!
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree