1. at the centre
    Joined
    19 Jun '04
    Moves
    3257
    06 Oct '07 08:151 edit
    Originally posted by GinoJ
    Imppressive!

    Yes, the answer is 180/7 degrees.
    How? It is yet to be proved analytically how the vertex angle A is equal to (pie)/7 radians i.e. 180/7 degrees.
  2. Joined
    14 Dec '05
    Moves
    5694
    06 Oct '07 16:29
    Originally posted by howzzat
    How? It is yet to be proved analytically how the vertex angle A is equal to (pie)/7 radians i.e. 180/7 degrees.
    The solution given by DeepThought way back in March was good enough, but this pi/7 answer is intriguing, if it was found independantly.
  3. H. T. & E. hte
    Joined
    21 May '04
    Moves
    3510
    06 Oct '07 17:182 edits
    The value of A (180/7 degrees), as claimed , has not been worked out analytically. The solution given by Deep Thought is a numerical solution. If the answer is exactly 180/7 degrees, it stands to reason that it can be proved so analytically. Numerical solution can give approximation to 180/7 degrees up to 30 or 40 decimal places or more but that is not an exact solution.
  4. Joined
    14 Dec '05
    Moves
    5694
    06 Oct '07 17:25
    Originally posted by ranjan sinha
    The value of A (180/7 degrees), as claimed , has not been worked out analytically. The solution given by Deep Thought is a numerical solution. If the answer is exactly 180/7 degrees, it stands to reason that it can be proved so analytically. Numerical solution can give approximation to 180/7 degrees up to 30 or 40 decimal places or more but that is not an exact solution.
    Yes! If only Gino had explained how he arrived at that value, this would not be raising it's ugly head again now.
  5. Joined
    25 Jul '04
    Moves
    3205
    07 Oct '07 15:351 edit
    A solution has been given at
    http://sarathian.livejournal.com
    This solution does not involve solving cubic equations.
  6. Joined
    14 Dec '05
    Moves
    5694
    08 Oct '07 11:35
    Originally posted by sarathian
    A solution has been given at
    http://sarathian.livejournal.com
    This solution does not involve solving cubic equations.
    That should finally settle it. Well done.
  7. H. T. & E. hte
    Joined
    21 May '04
    Moves
    3510
    11 Oct '07 07:47
    Originally posted by sarathian
    A solution has been given at
    http://sarathian.livejournal.com
    This solution does not involve solving cubic equations.
    yeah...that's deceptively simple.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree