Originally posted by joe shmo A cylindrical tank is being drained by a duct with
Area duct: A1= 3*10^(-4) m^2
Velocity of flow through duct: V1 = sqrt(2g*Z) where Z is the height of the liquid in the tank
initial mass of 2500 kg
density of water: p=10^3 kg/m^3
Hmm, are you sure they haven't given you the area of the tank?
Ahh you can relate that to Z_zero (start height), because you know the density
rearrange the flow velocity to get the units of velocity right, you need delta_height/delta_t, you will need you rexpression for the area of the tank to do this
you then need to integrate that and it should work
Removed
Joined
10 Dec '06
Moves
8528
19 Oct '10 16:27>
Originally posted by iamatiger Hmm, are you sure they haven't given you the area of the tank?
Ahh you can relate that to Z_zero (start height), because you know the density
rearrange the flow velocity to get the units of velocity right, you need delta_height/delta_t, you will need you rexpression for the area of the tank to do this
you then need to integrate that and it should work
As the question stands, it isn't solvable. You need either the area of the tank, or another given, such as the initial flowrate through the duct.
Nothing tells you whether the tank is shaped like a pan or like a straw, which will affect the velocity in the duct.
Not to be rude, but is this a stand alone question? Maybe is Q1.3, where the tank area would be given in Q1.1?
Removed
Joined
10 Dec '06
Moves
8528
19 Oct '10 18:49>1 edit
Originally posted by Igloo As the question stands, it isn't solvable. You need either the area of the tank, or another given, such as the initial flowrate through the duct.
Nothing tells you whether the tank is shaped like a pan or like a straw, which will affect the velocity in the duct.
Not to be rude, but is this a stand alone question? Maybe is Q1.3, where the tank area would be given in Q1.1?
It is a stand alone problem. Believe it or not, no such Area for the base nor 2nd initial condition exists in the problem statement or in the problem diagram.
I tutor these types of questions to our first year engineers. I've yet to see one where their isn't some sort of information about the tank.
Unless iamatiger can work some magic, I think you should call this question a dead loss.
Removed
Joined
10 Dec '06
Moves
8528
21 Oct '10 14:23>
Originally posted by Igloo I tutor these types of questions to our first year engineers. I've yet to see one where their isn't some sort of information about the tank.
Unless iamatiger can work some magic, I think you should call this question a dead loss.
I will now assess this to be true also, thanks for the reassurance.
Originally posted by Igloo I tutor these types of questions to our first year engineers. I've yet to see one where their isn't some sort of information about the tank.
Unless iamatiger can work some magic, I think you should call this question a dead loss.
Yes, most probably impossible.
Imagine a very thin tall tank, the flow will be fast and the tank will empty quite quickly. Now imagine a very wide short tank, as the width increases the height of water deceases and the flow gets slower and slower, tending to zero flow rate with an infinitely wide, zero height tank. all flow rates between these two are possible given the information provided, and so I think there is no unique solution.