1 edit
Originally posted by cmsMasterI found a player on the highest rating table with a rating of 1800 and a player on 1900. The difference between the two was 134. Of course that's just an estimate as we don't actually go on current rating but 30 day peak. However it's normally a pretty safe assumption that close to the same number are cut off at the top end as are included in the bottom. Probably more at the bottom thanks to the rating distrbution but that should balance with the fact that I didn't remove non-subs from consideration.
1 to 30 of 204
204 from 1800-1900, where'd you get 134?
2 edits
Originally posted by XanthosNZAh, I used "Find Player" and put in a minimum rating of 1800 and a max. of 1900, but this, of course, still includes the non-subs, so your estimate is probably closer.
I found a player on the highest rating table with a rating of 1800 and a player on 1900. The difference between the two was 134. Of course that's just an estimate as we don't actually go on current rating but 30 day peak. However it's normally a pretty safe assumption that close to the same number are cut off at the top end as are included in the bottom. P ...[text shortened]... tion but that should balance with the fact that I didn't remove non-subs from consideration.
EDIT: wow, mods this is probably something that should be looked into, I just searched 1800-1900's again and found that not only are the layers in that rating bracket included, but also many p1200's, what's this about?
Another EDIT: I figure that they are in the 1800's, but haven't played over 5 games, so this explains it...