Originally posted by roma45Yeah.......telling us how he's winning the argument (when actually he's being torn to shreds) and that he's standing up to bullies as his daddy taught him to.
gene would normally be here pretending to be outraged
his lying mouth will be full of MARS bars
poor sad sock
The sock puppet has run off crying to mummy now.
Bye Bye !!!
Originally posted by radioactive69socky now resorting to thumbs down
Yeah.......telling us how he's winning the argument (when actually he's being torn to shreds) and that he's standing up to bullies as his daddy taught him to.
The sock puppet has run off crying to mummy now.
Bye Bye !!!
he will be thinking hes winning
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI can comment only on the match in which I took part. My opponent, 64SoP, and I were within 50 rating points at the time the games were played.
Clan challenge 281635
My goodness it looks like all the Cops and criminals and all the sinners Saints!
In one game, he blundered in the opening and when I queried him on it, whether it was a miscalculation, he answered me back that he had had a meltdown. Such things happen. I once blundered away a queen against a 1500 player. And even Paul Leggett (who has at least 100 points on me) has also been known to leave a piece en prise occasionally.
In our second game, 64SoP put up tenacious resistance. I was not handed that point on a silver platter; he made me work bloody hard for it.
I made a short study of 64SoP's games before deciding on my openings against him, and it did not appear to me that he has a history of throwing games.
You might find Jumpin' Jack Flash here, but certainly no sympathy for the devil.
Originally posted by moonbusThanks for the input.
I can comment only on the match in which I took part. My opponent, 64SoP, and I were within 50 rating points at the time the games were played.
In one game, he blundered in the opening and when I queried him on it, whether it was a miscalculation, he answered me back that he had had a meltdown. Such things happen. I once blundered away a queen against a 1 ...[text shortened]... owing games.
You might find Jumpin' Jack Flash here, but certainly no sympathy for the devil.
The issue here was not the point differentials between players.
Which usually leads to some trying ro resurrect the sandbagging issue.
Robbie was casting suspicions on the margin of victory by one clan over the other.
Which leads to veiled accusations of cheating.
Which is nonsense by the way.
In Robbie's sad world, some clans aren't supposed to be that much better than other clans.
He was trying to create a distraction away from the solid evidence amassed against his clan.
I pulled up 10 challenges from his clan history to re-set the focus back to his clan where it belongs.
At the very least, it makes for good entertainment as we pick his argument to shreds.
ππ
Originally posted by mghrn55please try to refrain from rattling you snake, not everyone believes their own propaganda like you. this thread was merely done to get a rise out of Suzianne, another mission accomplished.
Thanks for the input.
The issue here was not the point differentials between players.
Which usually leads to some trying ro resurrect the sandbagging issue.
Robbie was casting suspicions on the margin of victory by one clan over the other.
Which leads to veiled accusations of cheating.
Which is nonsense by the way.
In Robbie's sad world, some cla ...[text shortened]...
At the very least, it makes for good entertainment as we pick his argument to shreds.
ππ
1. Metallica defeated - tick
2. Rise out of Suzianne - tick
Originally posted by moonbusDark side is powerful my former master, beware!
I can comment only on the match in which I took part. My opponent, 64SoP, and I were within 50 rating points at the time the games were played.
In one game, he blundered in the opening and when I queried him on it, whether it was a miscalculation, he answered me back that he had had a meltdown. Such things happen. I once blundered away a queen against a 1 ...[text shortened]... owing games.
You might find Jumpin' Jack Flash here, but certainly no sympathy for the devil.
Originally posted by radioactive69Hi there wannabee internet bully boys. . . . or is it just 'boy'?.....
Yeah.......telling us how he's winning the argument (when actually he's being torn to shreds) and that he's standing up to bullies as his daddy taught him to.
The sock puppet has run off crying to mummy now.
Bye Bye !!!
Mmmmmmmmmmmm. As robma would spookily say
Been away on 'life' business today. You remember that?, not 24/7 on here? Nope, thought not
You wanna ask head bully boy what he's trying to say, champ? I am, frankly, bemused. As such, v hard to retort
Away on more 'life' stuff til Saturday, but if the chuckle brother(s) want to say anything meaningful, I will get back to you after that
You still unable to access 'sport', champ. Try the forum help desk
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI looked up Suzianne's post addressed to you.
please try to refrain from rattling you snake, not everyone believes their own propaganda like you. this thread was merely done to get a rise out of Suzianne, another mission accomplished.
1. Metallica defeated - tick
2. Rise out of Suzianne - tick
It started with "Hey, stupid".
That's hardly a rise. π΄
Originally posted by mghrn55The margin of victory in Misfit challenges overall is well within tolerance for a legitimate clan. The margin of victory for the two challenges to which Robbie referred was lopsided, but not due to sandbagging or inflated ratings differentials.
Thanks for the input.
The issue here was not the point differentials between players.
Which usually leads to some trying ro resurrect the sandbagging issue.
Robbie was casting suspicions on the margin of victory by one clan over the other.
Which leads to veiled accusations of cheating.
Which is nonsense by the way.
In Robbie's sad world, some cla ...[text shortened]...
At the very least, it makes for good entertainment as we pick his argument to shreds.
ππ
Robbie's obsession with Metallica is sad. I wish it were otherwise. It just goes to show that a small number of malcontents can ruin a good thing for everyone.