Originally posted by Metal Brain I didn't say I told climate scientists that. People on this forum have said that though. Why would you ask a question based on something that nobody implied?
People on this forum are not climate scientists (as far as I know). While I am obviously far more knowledgeable on the climate than you are, I don't get remotely close to the expertise of actual climate scientists. If you wish to learn about the climate and how mankind is influencing it, I recommend you investigate the findings of climate scientists rather than the musings of people on this forum. A good start for the layman is here:
Originally posted by KazetNagorra People on this forum are not climate scientists (as far as I know). While I am obviously far more knowledgeable on the climate than you are, I don't get remotely close to the expertise of actual climate scientists. If you wish to learn about the climate and how mankind is influencing it, I recommend you investigate the findings of climate scientists rat ...[text shortened]... this forum. A good start for the layman is here:
Originally posted by KazetNagorra People on this forum are not climate scientists (as far as I know). While I am obviously far more knowledgeable on the climate than you are, I don't get remotely close to the expertise of actual climate scientists. If you wish to learn about the climate and how mankind is influencing it, I recommend you investigate the findings of climate scientists rat ...[text shortened]... this forum. A good start for the layman is here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
Your claim to be more knowledgeable on climate than me is laughable. How many times have I proved you wrong?
Originally posted by Metal Brain Your claim to be more knowledgeable on climate than me is laughable. How many times have I proved you wrong?
Your method for proving people wrong is laughable. Step 1 - Make a ridiculous claim and support that claim with a link to a dubious study. Step 2 - Realize that the underlying data in the study undermines your claim. Step 3 - Make a new claim that all who follows the link to see what your talking about are "wrong" for believing in nonsense.
How about actually proving yourself right sometime?
Originally posted by wildgrass Your method for proving people wrong is laughable. Step 1 - Make a ridiculous claim and support that claim with a link to a dubious study. Step 2 - Realize that the underlying data in the study undermines your claim. Step 3 - Make a new claim that all who follows the link to see what your talking about are "wrong" for believing in nonsense.
How about actually proving yourself right sometime?
I have proven many on this forum wrong on multiple occasions. Just because you are have not been following this forum long enough to see that does not make it untrue. BTW, why have you failed to post the link I asked you to on another thread? Are you afraid I will prove you wrong again? Remember the AMS link I posted that proved your claim that they were climate scientists WRONG.
I have proved you wrong at least once. Have you ever done that to me?
Did I bruise your ego? Is that why you are in denial I proved you wrong?
You have repeatedly lied so many times and been wrong so many times that whenever you claim that you have "repeatedly" proven him/us wrong, quite rightly, absolutely nobody that actually sometimes still bothers to reads your moronic posts believes you. So why do you continue to make a fool of yourself posting such claims that we all quite rightly don't believe? What's the point?
You have repeatedly lied so many times and been wrong so many times that whenever you claim that you have "repeatedly" proven him/us wrong, quite rightly, absolutely nobody that actually sometimes still bothers to reads your moronic posts believes you. So why do you continue to make a fool of yourself posting such claims that we all quite rightly don't believe? What's the point?
Humy
Lies are not magic. Repeating a lie again and again will not make it true. If you can prove that I lied go ahead and do it if you can. If you can prove I was wrong multiple times go ahead and do that. I'm sure you would be eager to do that if it were true..........YOU BLOODY LIAR!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by KazetNagorra With a PhD in physics on my side, and a high school diploma from Hicksville High, Trumpstan on your side, I think it's a fair assessment.
How many times have you "proven [me] wrong"?
I have proven you wrong so many times I have lost count, but I can give at least two examples.
1:
You claimed atmospheric physicists are not climate scientists. Even though you gave up on trying to prove your case (because you realized you were wrong) humy tried and failed after you ran away from the debate like a scared little girl.
2:
You tried to prove climate scientists believed GW was mostly due to man made causes using wikipedia. Wikipedia had no such evidence. All were polls that did NOT consist of 100% climate scientists. You failed miserably!
Can you show two examples where you proved me wrong like I just did you?
Originally posted by Metal Brain I have proven you wrong so many times I have lost count, but I can give at least two examples.
1:
You claimed atmospheric physicists are not climate scientists. Even though you gave up on trying to prove your case (because you realized you were wrong) humy tried and failed after you ran away from the debate like a scared little girl.
2:
You trie ...[text shortened]... ou failed miserably!
Can you show two examples where you proved me wrong like I just did you?
Are you saying GW is wrong because there is no WIKI supporting it? How bout this:
http://www. ...[text shortened]... ion where those guys are full of shyte and only YOUR guys have the true story, is that about it?
None of those links prove what they assert. Any moron can make an assertion without facts which is what you are doing. If you insist on believing those assertions are accompanied by facts based on science, show me where they exist in those links of faith based crap. I look forward to showing how ridiculous their so called evidence is. For example, the first link says they can't find another cause so it must be co2. That isn't evidence, it is a guess and that isn't science.
Anthropogenic global warming myth
07 Jun '17 15:43
Back to Top