Originally posted by FMF Well there are three or four posts on this thead alone that have explained to you point blank - and directly - that I'm just not going to type out stuff for you that I've typed out countless times before and yet you've somehow managed to not understand it every single time. So, maybe you'd have the same inability to understand even if you looked at ten thousand posts. 😛
Ok lets see you were "open minded" enough to realise that your "beliefs about the Bible and what it claims" had changed. Sounds rather vague to me, but anyways I guess that counts as 'point blank and direct' in your book.
Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk Ok lets see you were "open minded" enough to realise that your "beliefs about the Bible and what it claims" had changed. Sounds rather vague to me, but anyways I guess that counts as 'point blank and direct' in your book.
If that in your book is point blank and to the point, then I am afraid I will be wasting my time reading those 10 000 odd posts, especially if they are also 'point blank and to the point'.
Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk If that in your book is point blank and to the point, then I am afraid I will be wasting my time reading those 10 000 odd posts, especially if they are also 'point blank and to the point'.
Point blank what? I've told you point blank that I am not going to type out any stuff especially for you. I'm just not going to do it. I can't get any more point blank and to the point than that. And it's tens of thousands of posts, not 10,000... and as far as I'm concerned, very, very few of them are "odd". 😉
Originally posted by FMF Point blank what? I've told you [b]point blank that I am not going to type out any stuff especially for you. I'm just not going to do it. I can't get any more point blank and to the point than that. And it's tens of thousands of posts, not 10,000... and as far as I'm concerned, very, very few of them are "odd". 😉[/b]
Ah there I was thinking that you meant you had point blank answered my question.
Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk Ah there I was thinking that you meant you had [b]point blank answered my question.[/b]
You've asked me several times if I'd tell you about stuff that I've explained can be found in my posting history, assuming your curiosity is genuine. I've told you point blank that I'm not going to ~ I've told you maybe 4-5 times.You should read the content of my posts. 😛
Originally posted by roigam Excuse me but this has been translated just that way in several other Bible.
The NWT used master texts for it's translations.
A master text is accepted by most Bible scholars as the best translation available
according to the latest ancient scrolls available.
What Bible do you use and what does it say at John 1:1? Also, what scrols were used in
that particular translation?
Once more, because you brought it up (not me) and then took flight when asked about it. Be clear now. Are you - or are you not - claiming that the NWT translation of "EN ARCHE EN HO LOGOS, KAI HO LOGOS EN PROS TON THEON, KAI THEOS EN HO LOGOS" as 'In the beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god' is "accepted by most Bible scholars as the best translation available"?
Originally posted by FMF You've asked me several times if I'd tell you about stuff that I've explained can be found in my posting history, assuming your curiosity is genuine. I've told you point blank that I'm not going to ~ I've told you maybe 4-5 times.You should read the content of my posts. 😛
Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk What a lame cop out.😛
You will find that you'll get treated here only with as much respect as you earn or deserve. On this topic, on page 18 of this thread, I got the distinct impression you were simply taking piss by being as gormless as possible, ignoring what I was saying, and asking the same already answered question over and over again. I decided to indulge you no more on the issue which is a personal and fundamental one - it's not something suitable for your kind of lumbering piss take routine. Call it a cop out if that makes you feel better about it.
Originally posted by FMF You will find that you'll get treated here only with as much respect as you earn or deserve. On this topic, on page 18 of this thread, I got the distinct impression you were simply taking piss by being as gormless as possible, ignoring what I was saying, and asking the same already answered question over and over again. I decided to indulge you no more on the is ...[text shortened]... r kind of lumbering piss take routine. Call it a cop out if that makes you feel better about it.
Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk Seems Suzianne was right about you all along.
Be that as it may, but I wouldn't swap my posting history on this forum for her's for all the tea in China. If I had her posting history, I'd be at pains to keep it hidden from family and friends. The same can't be said about my own posting history. 😉
Originally posted by FMF Be that as it may, but I wouldn't swap my posting history on this forum for her's for all the tea in China. If I had her posting history, I'd be at pains to keep it hidden from family and friends. The same can't be said about my own posting history. 😉
You certainly hold a high opinion of yourself. For your sake I hope other people do as well. 😉
Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk You certainly hold a high opinion of yourself. For your sake I hope other people do as well. 😉
A high opinion? I simply stand by everything I've ever posted on this forum. I take full responsibility for it. I'm proud of it in that sense. You may not have been here long enough to realize that, for people like me (and, I'm sure, there are others who would say the same), talking about how you agree with Suzianne, or how Suzianne agrees with you, is not going to cut any mustard. If you thought that was a zinger, you'd best think again. 😛
Originally posted by FMF A high opinion? I simply stand by everything I've ever posted on this forum. I take full responsibility for it. I'm proud of it in that sense. You may not have been here long enough to realize that, for people like me (and, I'm sure, there are others who would say the same), talking about how you agree with Suzianne, or how Suzianne agrees with you, is not going to cut any mustard. If you thought that was a zinger, you'd best think again. 😛
Yes you must really be proud about how you have managed to duck and dive to avoid answering a simple straightforward question. 😛
Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk Yes you must really be proud about how you have managed to duck and dive to avoid answering a simple straightforward question. 😛
Which one? I think I've answered all your questions to the extent that have wanted to and without repeating myself or rehashing (retyping) stuff that I have discussed in thousands and thousands of previous posts.
Dependencies for 'Chrisitan' salvation
26 Aug '16 08:32
Back to Top