Originally posted by sonshipI would have thought it was a straight forward question for a "Gospel announcer" to answer. Here it is again: "According to your ideology, a Christian who is a hateful racist will still be "saved" as long as he or she believes in Jesus, is that correct?" I think I know why you find it inconvenient and deflect instead, but we shall see. Do hateful racist Christians only have to think Jesus is their saviour in order to be "saved"?
I think within the last 24 hours I agreed to leave you alone. You have some real problems with Gospel announcers. I think I said this would work best if you didn't chase after me as if to dare me to talk to you.
Why don't we just keep it that way?
Originally posted by sonshipI think we should just keep it an arena of free speech where people hold each other to account for their ideas and what they say. If you want to immunize yourself and your torturer god ideology from scrutiny and dissent, start a blog and then you can just delete anything and everything that displeases you. Here, you can ignore my questions and observations and your unwillingness and/or inability to respond can be a part of the public discourse, and people can make of it what they will.
Why don't we just keep it that way?
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by EladarSee, this is what you do that makes you a hypocrite, along with others in this forum.
23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to Him and urged Him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.” 24 He answered, “I was only sent to the lost sheep of Israel.”
25 The woman came and knelt before Him. “Lord, help me!” she said. 26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to their dogs.” 27
...[text shortened]... owner does not get a one way ticket to hell. Surely owning slaves is worse than being a racist.
You say with your mouth that the Bible is inerrant, infallible, and then you try to prop up your own misanthropic beliefs by claiming that the Bible follows your beliefs, when one's beliefs should follow the correct (not incorrect, like yours) understanding of the Bible. You continuously "get it wrong", assuming your base beliefs to be correct, then base your treatment of others on your wrong assumptions.
There are few others here with a more off-base assumptive (mis)understanding of the Bible as you have.
Stop assuming the Bible follows your beliefs and adopt your beliefs based on what the Bible actually says, and not what you believe it says. The JWs make the same mistake, by the way. Your first step should be to ask God for wisdom to understand. Then wait for it, instead of assuming that he gave it to you already, thus believing your errancy to be correct.
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by EladarThe irony is rich in this one.
When you see a Chriatian brother or sister falling to a work of the flesh admonish.
Try not to work the beliefs of man into God's truth. Jesus warned against it.
Would you tell a slave owner that he or she must set the slaves free to follow God?
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by FMFIt wasn't his ideology, so climb right down off his back.
I would have thought it was a straight forward question for a "Gospel announcer" to answer. Here it is again: "According to your ideology, a Christian who is a hateful racist will still be "saved" as long as he or she believes in Jesus, is that correct?" I think I know why you find it inconvenient and deflect instead, but we shall see. Do hateful racist Christians only have to think Jesus is their saviour in order to be "saved"?
It was Eladar's ideology.
And by the way, no. He's wrong.
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by SuzianneSlow down. You're fumbling. I am not talking about Eladar's ideology. I am asking sonship about sonship's ideology as it pertains to racist Christians.
It wasn't his ideology, so climb right down off his back.
It was Eladar's ideology.
And by the way, no. He's wrong.
