Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeYour definition of love and God's definition of love are not the same. I'd much rather have your condemnation than God's.
Some of your views, expressed in these forums, is as far from love as one can possibly imagine.
In other words, you are welcome to your opinion.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 28791
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by EladarYou are also frequently at odds with God's definition of love. (You know, the one laid out in the bible). Hope you know what you're doing...
Your definition of love and God's definition of love are not the same. I'd much rather have your condemnation than God's.
In other words, you are welcome to your opinion.
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by FMFIn any case, sonship's message you replied to and your reply to it had almost nothing in common. You quoted him, and then ran what he said through your internal filter and decided that he said something he didn't. If you were going to reply to something he wrote long ago, then perhaps you should have quoted that, instead of including a quote that had next-to-nothing in common with your blurt.
Slow down. You're fumbling. I am not talking about Eladar's ideology. I am asking sonship about sonship's ideology as it pertains to racist Christians.
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by SuzianneYou appear to have got the wrong end of the stick.
In any case, sonship's message you replied to and your reply to it had almost nothing in common. You quoted him, and then ran what he said through your internal filter and decided that he said something he didn't. If you were going to reply to something he wrote long ago, then perhaps you should have quoted that, instead of including a quote that had next-to-nothing in common with your blurt.
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by divegeesterWhy, do you take offense?
Of course you have data on this, or are you just referring to a couple of streets in Alabama?
It's just like saying that most people who agree with Ayn Rand's disgusting philosophy also are conservative. That is, if they ever read or understood her books to begin with.
What I'm saying is that most (the vast majority, I said) racists are conservative. This is not the same as saying most conservatives are racist. For your information, the cart goes after the horse, not before. So untwist those panties, if you please.
Originally posted by SuzianneI'm not upset, not in the slightest. I just think you are making a statement you cannot substantiate. It's a phenomena also known as talking bullshlt.
Why, do you take offense?
It's just like saying that most people who agree with Ayn Rand's disgusting philosophy also are conservative. That is, if they ever read or understood her books to begin with.
What I'm saying is that most (the vast majority, I said) racists are conservative. This is not the same as saying most conservatives are racist. For ...[text shortened]... information, the cart goes after the horse, not before. So untwist those panties, if you please.
Furthermore, how can you possibly claim that the "vast majority" is not the "most"?
I think it's fair to say that the panties most likely to be "in a twist", are yours.
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by KellyJayAgain, saying that racists are conservative is not the same thing as saying conservatives are racist. There is evidence for one; not so much the other.
I do not agree with you on this, but it isn't an ugly truth for either liberal or conservatives
in my opinion. Its an ugly human truth that has us hating for no good reason.
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by EladarAgain, you think you're using facts to prop up your opinion, but again, it is only your own racist opinion. Any studies attempting to prove this opinion are flawed, at best.
Why do you call being a racist hateful?
If you point out that by race from highest to lowest IQ the order is...
East Asia, White, Hispanic, Black. The first fair close together, large gap then last two grouped together .
If you say this then tou area racist. Yet there is no hate, just scientific fact.
15 Mar 17
Originally posted by EladarIt is because we do not deny the text!! What we deny is your racist twisting of its meaning! Get a clue!
He disagreed with? Or he knew were going to hell?
Notice how no one can actually deal with the texts given. All they can do is attempt to belittle.
It is almost as if this is an internet board.
As I said, people do this all the time here. People say "If you disagree with what I say, then you disagree with God, because this is in the Bible." NO, they are disagreeing with your interpretation of the Bible.