15 Apr 17
Originally posted by sonship
Excuse me Mr. Innocent.
You wrote this nasty invective about me. [My bolding]
[b] More blather.
You claim that the trinity doctrine is "taught" in the Bible, it isn't. "Trinity" "triune" "3 people in one God" are words and phrases that are not even mentioned in the BIble, let alone "taught".
And I recall you elsewhere ...[text shortened]... lather."
And it is possible that I recall you using the phrase "mumbo jumbo" for my writing.[/b]Just accuse him of causing people to get tortured forever, compare him to a Holocaust denier, question his mental health, or call him an anti-Christ and be done with it, sonship. 😕
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
15 Apr 17
Originally posted by FMFSo, it looks like you're saying that you won't be happy until Divegeester is as miserably filled up with malice as you are.
Just accuse him of causing people to get tortured forever, compare him to a Holocaust denier, question his mental health, or call him an anti-Christ and be done with it, sonship. 😕
Originally posted by sonshipI stand by that statement. Actually it's quite polite.
Excuse me Mr. Innocent.
You wrote this nasty invective about me.
You claim that the trinity doctrine is "taught" in the Bible, it isn't. "Trinity" "triune" "3 people in one God" are words and phrases that are not even mentioned in the BIble, let alone "taught".
Yes you do write mumbo-jumbo at times. Much of what you believe I think is error and some is even cultish doctrine. All your stuff about people on other worlds witnessing the lost being hung in chains etc. It's nonsense. Your overweening and creepy "love" of the trinity doctrine, not just error, it's a bit odd. The videos of your church you posted recently, again very odd behaviour from those men at the front.
Like the JWs in that you assume that me challenging you, is me challenging God. You are so wrapped up in your own self righteousness and beliefs that any challenge in this forum is consider "clamor". And now you've been caught posting other people's ministry as your own.
16 Apr 17
1 edit
Originally posted by FMF"What?"
For example?
It's quite simple.
You said: "It's a turn of phrase, sonship. I also use the expressions "the devil's in the details" and "angels dancing on the head of a pin", but it doesn't meant I have any reason to believe the devil or angels exist."
And to recap, I said: "Do you say things you don't mean a lot?"
Well, do you?
16 Apr 17
Originally posted by SuzianneBut when I say things like "the devil's in the detail" and "you are merely counting the angels on the head of a pin" I DO mean those things. Perhaps they are British idioms and that's why you mistakenly think they have some literal meaning?
"What?"
It's quite simple.
You said: "It's a turn of phrase, sonship. I also use the expressions "the devil's in the details" and "angels dancing on the head of a pin", but it doesn't meant I have any reason to believe the devil or angels exist."
And to recap, I said: "Do you say things you don't mean a lot?"
Well, do you?
17 Apr 17
Originally posted by sonshipThe dictionary is a great book when it comes to the veil of revelation being pulled back on the spelling of Suzianne.
Hello Suzzianne,
[b]Daniel is a great book when it comes to the veil of revelation being pulled back and we see being able to see God's working behind the scenes of human governments.[/b]
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
17 Apr 17
Suzziane,
Daniel's prediction of the span of years to the death of the Messiah is amazing.
It is no wonder people just cannot believe that Daniel could have written this.
The accuracy of the prophecy of 69 weeks (weeks of seven years each) to the death of Jesus has divine foreknowledge as evidence of God's providence over history.