Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Announcements

Announcements

  1. Subscriber Russ
    RHP Code Monkey
    19 Jul '07 13:52 / 1 edit
    Because of the increasing number of complaints regarding people accepting and then deleting open invites, all accepted invites are now returned back as an available open invite once deleted. If the original creator of the open invite chooses to delete the game, it is removed permanently, as before.

    -Russ

    edit : No "Plain English" award for me for this post.
  2. Standard member bannedplayer306509
    Best Loser
    19 Jul '07 16:50
    Awesome.
  3. Standard member irontigran
    Rob Scheider is..
    19 Jul '07 20:06
    Originally posted by Russ
    Because of the increasing number of complaints regarding people accepting and then deleting open invites, all accepted invites are now returned back as an available open invite once deleted. If the original creator of the open invite chooses to delete the game, it is removed permanently, as before.

    -Russ

    edit : No "Plain English" award for me for this post.
    oops, i do this quite often...i dont mean to be abusing it, its just when the time is 1/0 id like to get into the game a bit... sorry if i caused problems for anyone..
  4. 20 Jul '07 11:31
    Excellent.
  5. Subscriber Russ
    RHP Code Monkey
    20 Jul '07 12:20
    There was a subtle issue with this update, which has now been fixed.

    Any people unable to move in an open invite game will have their games sorted out over the next few hours.

    -Russ
  6. Subscriber Russ
    RHP Code Monkey
    20 Jul '07 13:16
    Play can now commence in the effected games.

    -Russ
  7. 20 Jul '07 22:39
    Originally posted by Russ
    Because of the increasing number of complaints regarding people accepting and then deleting open invites, all accepted invites are now returned back as an available open invite once deleted. If the original creator of the open invite chooses to delete the game, it is removed permanently, as before.

    -Russ
    Great news.
  8. 21 Jul '07 10:47
    Wouldn't it be better if you just weren't allowed to delete a game once you've accepted an open invite? What legitimate need could there be to allow this? Even if the invite goes back into the list, it is annoying and delays the inviting player getting a game started. Shouldn't people be expected to evaluate whether they are interested in the game before accepting it, and then live with their decision?
  9. Standard member Dutch Defense
    Stealer of Souls
    21 Jul '07 12:08
    Originally posted by d36366
    Wouldn't it be better if you just weren't allowed to delete a game once you've accepted an open invite? What legitimate need could there be to allow this? Even if the invite goes back into the list, it is annoying and delays the inviting player getting a game started. Shouldn't people be expected to evaluate whether they are interested in the game before accepting it, and then live with their decision?
    Some people instead of going to advanced options to set the rating limits type the limits in the box that says game name, which would make it so anyone could accept that game offer. The user wouldn't want to play them and wouldn't be too happy if that were the case.
  10. Standard member bannedplayer306509
    Best Loser
    21 Jul '07 21:39
    Originally posted by Dutch Defense
    Some people instead of going to advanced options to set the rating limits type the limits in the box that says game name, which would make it so anyone could accept that game offer. The user wouldn't want to play them and wouldn't be too happy if that were the case.
    Then set real limits the proper way.
  11. 21 Jul '07 22:36 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by Dutch Defense
    Some people instead of going to advanced options to set the rating limits type the limits in the box that says game name, which would make it so anyone could accept that game offer. The user wouldn't want to play them and wouldn't be too happy if that were the case.
    That issue only affects the person who placed the invite ("the placer" ), not the person who accepted it ("the accepter" ). I think the placer should be allowed to delete the game (there might be several reasons why they are not happy with the accepter. not just rating) but I cannot see why the accepter should be allowed to back out, having accepted the game with full information available to them.
  12. Standard member Wheely
    Instant Buzz
    23 Jul '07 11:12 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by d36366
    That issue only affects the person who placed the invite ("the placer" ), not the person who accepted it ("the accepter" ). I think the placer should be allowed to delete the game (there might be several reasons why they are not happy with the accepter. not just rating) but I cannot see why the accepter should be allowed to back out, having accepted the game with full information available to them.
    What's the difference. If someone wants to avoid playing a game they will just resign anyway.

    The way Russ has done this is much cleaner and I can't quite see what difference it makes to the person starting an open invite,

    Edit: here's an example of why you might want to delete an open invite. Someone creates a game 1 day n/a and asks for a quick game. You accept the game and the creator doesn't move for the rest of the day. You had one day where you could move fast.
  13. 23 Jul '07 22:01
    Originally posted by Wheely

    Edit: here's an example of why you might want to delete an open invite. Someone creates a game 1 day n/a and asks for a quick game. You accept the game and the creator doesn't move for the rest of the day. You had one day where you could move fast.
    Fair point. I withdraw my suggestion.
  14. 24 Jul '07 20:19
    Originally posted by d36366
    Fair point. I withdraw my suggestion.
    No don't withdraw it - it is a good suggestion.
  15. 25 Jul '07 19:41
    Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
    No don't withdraw it - it is a good suggestion.
    Ok, I withdraw my withdrawal.

    I used to be indecisive ...