Originally posted by STANGHi stan,
Fear, greed and apathy wins again.
Bush is a liar and a war monger.
Bush is a threat to the security of the world.
God bless America ... and the world. We're going to need it !!!
(With spelling corrected for those that are more concerned about spelling)
Notice you are getting small letters? Because your abilities are not too good. Express and explain REASONS for each accusation and blurted stupidity.
Then. Maybe somebody will care. It is up to you to earn serious argument. As long as you act out the fool... nobody but fools (like maywhattheharm) will reply.
Seriously. Get with it. Use your brain. Don't blurt nonsense. Think. Argue. Post your soul in readable and defensable form.
Originally posted by STANGOk. I read you about twenty times. I still don't know if you want to express yourself and/or UNDERSTAND others. What do you want,Stan? Just to express..... what? or to just be important?
I have in the past but it was largely unanswered because of patriotism I suspect.
Besides, I'm not after "serious arguement" with a few people.
There's alot of other people who I'd simply like to consider my statement.
Trust me. Nobody is important. We are all just fools dangling in the wind. But that is good.
Anyway. Why all the Question Marks and silent posts? You are able and can do it. Why are you so frustrated?
I am frustrated because nobody ever notices that I am not just a hillbilly hick.
Why are you frustrated?
Mike
How much concern do American's have when allowing for the possibility that the balance of power is going to shift over the next 50 years whilst America continues to be perceived as an aggressor with suspect motives ?
This is a question about how the world will be when America no longer enjoys its current level of control and the world is short of diplomacy and full of weapons.
By diplomacy I mean a past and present where fair and peaceful outcomes have been negotiated.
Here's just one example why people need to consider the longer term consequences of their country's actions (beyond one politician's time in power) and why it is necessary for a major overhaul of foreign policy.
Those for suicide bombing in defence of Islam
Indonesia 27%
Pakistan 33%
Jordon 43%
Nigeria 47%
Lebanon 73%
This is just one example. However, this example also shows that there's more to be done than eliminating small fanatical groups.
(Sources: http://people-press.org/ and http://www.victorynewsmagazine.com/AmericaInEyesOfTheWorld.htm)
Originally posted by STANGso...............................you're saying that small fanatical groups should be done away with. you give specific examples of islam, and -indeed- violence in islam. and yet you have a subtle disliking for bush...?
How much concern do American's have when allowing for the possibility that the balance of power is going to shift over the next 50 years whilst America continues to be perceived as an aggressor with suspect motives ?
This is a question about how the world will be when America no longer enjoys its current level of control and the world is short of diplomac ...[text shortened]... http://people-press.org/ and http://www.victorynewsmagazine.com/AmericaInEyesOfTheWorld.htm)