@Cliff-Mashburn saidWe know you'd rather just take a flamethrower to all of them.
180,000 homeless in California, that means each homeless person could have been given over 130,000 dollars each.
Instead, NO ONE knows where that money went and almost nothing was done for them.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidWe have a constant drip of homeless coming from red states to increase the numbers.
180,000 homeless in California, that means each homeless person could have been given over 130,000 dollars each.
Instead, NO ONE knows where that money went and almost nothing was done for them.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidCan you cite a non YouTube source?
180,000 homeless in California, that means each homeless person could have been given over 130,000 dollars each.
Instead, NO ONE knows where that money went and almost nothing was done for them.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidYah, man, corporate welfare is bad. Where you been?
180,000 homeless in California, that means each homeless person could have been given over 130,000 dollars each.
Instead, NO ONE knows where that money went and almost nothing was done for them.
Giving money directly to people who need it is a better strategy. You should be a Democrat.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidhttps://davisvanguard.org/2025/08/newsom-homelessness-progress-report/
180,000 homeless in California, that means each homeless person could have been given over 130,000 dollars each.
Instead, NO ONE knows where that money went and almost nothing was done for them.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidhopefully, that's $24B of ^their^ money
180,000 homeless in California, that means each homeless person could have been given over 130,000 dollars each.
Instead, NO ONE knows where that money went and almost nothing was done for them.
@Earl-of-Trumps saidEven if it was federal money it would still be California money because CA pays more than it's share of Federal taxes.
hopefully, that's $24B of ^their^ money