@AverageJoe1
Here is the actual time line of the attempts to get back those docs.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-indicted-mar-a-lago-documents-investigation-timeline/
So now for you the presence of top secret and above TS docs are in the hands of an ex POTUS IN HIS HOUSE FOR MONTHS IN A TOTALLY UNSECURED LOCATION means it is clear to us here you have downgraded in your mind the need for such documents, no matter that the Chinese have already been found to have tried to penetrate those walls of Trumps and I have no doubt whatsoever a LOT of foreign agents have viewed them and that puts anyone listed as an asset to the US are in extreme danger for daring to help us.
It also makes other countries balk at the attempt by the US to provide such help now that your god DAMN king trump has stolen them and taken MONTH after MONTH to give them back and I have no doubt also there are more docs hidden way in some other of his properties. There should be a concerted effort to search every damned building he owns and just see how many MORE his is hiding.
So because Trump is your god king, now national security doesn't matter any more and any agent who gets killed because of Trump hiding them in plain site with ZERO security, he will have or already HAS blood on his traitorous hands.
Just what do you think Trump will do with TS docs if he become POTUS again?
@sonhouse saidWhat crimes? Speaking is not a crime.
@Metal-Brain
Oh, so they are innocent of crimes because YOU said so? It is clear you are just spouting what your Russian bosses WANT you to say.
They were not charged because they are given a carrot, you CAN be charged but all will be forgiven if you flip on the REAL head snake and you KNOW who that is.
THAT is why they were not charged but you don't even read a tiny bit of it so all you can do is puke out words given to you by your Russian bosses.
@sonhouse saidSearch of all his buildings? Just his? Biden has FOUR buildings,, paid for with dirty money, ......should they not search them as well?. And those of his criminal son, who may be covering for him?
@AverageJoe1
Here is the actual time line of the attempts to get back those docs.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-indicted-mar-a-lago-documents-investigation-timeline/
So now for you the presence of top secret and above TS docs are in the hands of an ex POTUS IN HIS HOUSE FOR MONTHS IN A TOTALLY UNSECURED LOCATION means it is clear to us here you have downgraded i ...[text shortened]... his traitorous hands.
Just what do you think Trump will do with TS docs if he become POTUS again?
Here is the big question: Why Not.? Please entertain us with your capitalized reasoning.
@averagejoe1 saidSpare us the Republican Fairy Tales.
Search of all his buildings? Just his? Biden has FOUR buildings,, paid for with dirty money, ......should they not search them as well?. And those of his criminal son, who may be covering for him?
Here is the big question: Why Not.? Please entertain us with your capitalized reasoning.
Reminds me of a certain Howard Roark:
https://statuskuo.substack.com/p/does-trump-have-a-strong-free-speech
Attorney Marc Elias:
I walk into a bank, and I think they are wrongfully holding my money. I think my balance is $5,000, and they think my balance is zero. And I genuinely believe that I am owed $5,000. That doesn't excuse me from robbing the bank. I can't pull out a gun and take the money.
Just because you believe you own a property that somebody else possesses (and legally owns) doesn't excuse you if you decide to demolish it with dynamite and the cops come after you.
Ayn Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness“The Nature of Government,”:
even a society whose every member were fully rational and faultlessly moral, could not function in a state of anarchy; it is the need of objective laws and of an arbiter for honest disagreements among men that necessitates the establishment of a government.
@metal-brain saidI hate to have to pressure your third grade language skills.
That sure was a long read just for just mere speculation.
They have no evidence. co-conspirator or not there are no charges.
The obvious explanation is they only want Trump because the others are not presidential candidates. And the charges are all weak. It is all based on political speech which is protected by the constitution.
You are also conflating speech with actions. You think what he says are actions. No, that is speech.
@averagejoe1 saidExcept that it clearly did not, despite what your Führer tries to lie to you about.
In other words, you are correct, Avjoe, so I stand corrected. The raid happened first!!!!! Sincerely, suzyann
@athousandyoung saidBold move, quoting Rand back to them. Kudos.
Reminds me of a certain Howard Roark:https://statuskuo.substack.com/p/does-trump-have-a-strong-free-speech
Attorney Marc Elias:
I walk into a bank, and I think they are wrongfully holding my money. I think my balance is $5,000, and they think my balance is zero. And I genuinely believe that I am owed $5,000. That doesn't excuse me from robbing the bank ...[text shortened]... iter for honest disagreements among men that necessitates the establishment of a government.